2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmrt.2022.07.168
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Innovative X-ray diffraction and micromagnetic approaches for reliable residual stress assessment in deep rolled and microfinished AISI 4140 components

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Interestingly, there are a few recent studies focused on adopting novel measurement and/or characterization techniques for controlling the DR process. For instance, the wavelet transformation-based identification technique [87], the cos α-method of X-ray diffractometry with the micromagnetic approach [88], techniques for monitoring the surface quality [89], etc. These novel approaches indicate the potential for faster and more efficient control of the DR process in industrial applications.…”
Section: The Deep Rolling Processmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Interestingly, there are a few recent studies focused on adopting novel measurement and/or characterization techniques for controlling the DR process. For instance, the wavelet transformation-based identification technique [87], the cos α-method of X-ray diffractometry with the micromagnetic approach [88], techniques for monitoring the surface quality [89], etc. These novel approaches indicate the potential for faster and more efficient control of the DR process in industrial applications.…”
Section: The Deep Rolling Processmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Proto apparatus is limited to seven different incident angles between ±13 • ; for each incident angle, 30 exposures of 0.25 s were used, so measuring time was 52.5 s. All the diffraction peaks were fitted by using the Gaussian peak fitting method to obtain the value of residual stress. (2) The measurement device used for the cosα method is Pulstec µ-X360n X-ray residual stress analyzer with Cr-tube (X-ray wavelength λ = 2.291 Å, operating voltage is 30KV, operating current is 2mA), which is a compact portable system with a 2D area detector based on the principle that the strains are first determined by the acquired Debye-Scherrer ring and then the residual stress is calculated by the cosine α method [19][20][21]. The Kα doublet from {220} plane's family was used due to its high Bragg's angle (2θ = 128.902 • ) providing better accuracy of measurement; the surface of the STACER was cleaned by ethanol without any other treatment.…”
Section: Residual Stress Measurementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…XRD is a technique mainly used to characterize the stress state [3] and especially the residual stresses [4][5][6] of materials for engineering applications. Recent investigations have focused on the residual stress assessment of deep rolled and microfinished AISI 4140 components with the novel time-efficient cos α-method instead of the sin 2 ψ method [7]. By means of high-energy synchrotron X-ray diffraction, phase-specific stresses were calculated using d hkl -sin 2 ψ distributions from recorded Debye-Scherrer rings [8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%