2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.jengtecman.2014.09.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Innovativeness, operations priorities and corporate performance: An analysis based on a taxonomy of innovativeness

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
20
0
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
2
20
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Organizational readiness for changes that support the development of innovations in products and processes can attain high company performance (Camisón & Villar-López, 2014) and resulting the best corporate performance (Kilic et al, 2015). Organizational innovation strategies have a positive impact on innovative performance (Bolívar-Ramos et al, 2012).…”
Section: Research Methodology and Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Organizational readiness for changes that support the development of innovations in products and processes can attain high company performance (Camisón & Villar-López, 2014) and resulting the best corporate performance (Kilic et al, 2015). Organizational innovation strategies have a positive impact on innovative performance (Bolívar-Ramos et al, 2012).…”
Section: Research Methodology and Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Innovative performance can also be measured by market share innovation (Wadhwa et al, 2017), discovery of new products, devices and process systems (Tajasom et al, 2015). Meanwhile, Kilic et al (2015) measure the size of innovative performance by taking into account the effects of innovation on company performance measured in indicators of production, finance and market performance. The concept of authentic followership began to emerge at the beginning of this century (de Zilwa, 2016).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While the extant literature offers concepts such as strategic posture (Covin and Slevin ) and entrepreneurial orientation (Lumpkin and Dess ), whose operationalizations include a “strong emphasis on R&D, technological leadership, and innovation,” these concepts are more broadly operationalized in order to also capture other dimensions like proactiveness and risk‐taking. Existing literature also suggests several competitive/operational priorities such as cost, quality, flexibility, and delivery (Kilic et al ), although their conceptualizations and operationalizations do not explicitly relate to innovation.…”
Section: Theoretical Background and Hypotheses Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, it can be defined that business simulation represents activities which describe real states from the outside worlds (Prensky, 2001), but in protected and controlled environment, in order to become familiar with particular business process and final results (Dusak, 1992;Milovanovic et al, 2016). Furthermore, well established simulations are a powerful tool (Finkelsten et al, 2005) for different users for preparing quantitative analysis (Shannon, 1975;Milovanovic et al, 2013;Kaurin et al, 2011), but also one of the most efficient way of learning highly sophisticated skills, such as: analysis, synthesis and creating new knowledge (Leger et al, 2011). They cover all processes and possible decisions influenced by external factors within the company's business decision making process which is complex, and for creating and establishing it required huge number of experts with different competences.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%