2017
DOI: 10.1039/c6nj03821b
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Inorganic selenium speciation in water and biological samples by three phase hollow fiber-based liquid phase microextraction coupled with HPLC-UV

Abstract: A rapid, sensitive, high clean-up and economic three phase hollow fiber liquid phase microextraction method followed by HPLC-UV was applied for speciation of inorganic selenium in water and biological samples.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

1
1
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
1
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…When 60 mmol L −1 (NH 4 ) 2 HPO 4 served as the mobile phase, the retention times of organic Se (SeCys and SeMet) slightly increased with the increase in pH, while the retention times of inorganic selenium [Se (IV) and Se (VI)] were reduced, and the retention time of Se (VI) was reduced greatly (Figure 3). This was in agreement with the findings of previous studies [31,32], the retention time of Se (VI) decreased with the increase of pH using 40 mmol L −1 phosphate buffer as the mobile phase [30], while only Se(IV) and Se(VI) were detected with pH up to 8, and the chromatographic peaks of SeCys2, MeSeCys and SeMet were not found with 40 mmol L −1 (NH 4 ) 2 HPO 4 as the mobile phase [32]. In addition, pH also influenced the peaks of various Se species.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…When 60 mmol L −1 (NH 4 ) 2 HPO 4 served as the mobile phase, the retention times of organic Se (SeCys and SeMet) slightly increased with the increase in pH, while the retention times of inorganic selenium [Se (IV) and Se (VI)] were reduced, and the retention time of Se (VI) was reduced greatly (Figure 3). This was in agreement with the findings of previous studies [31,32], the retention time of Se (VI) decreased with the increase of pH using 40 mmol L −1 phosphate buffer as the mobile phase [30], while only Se(IV) and Se(VI) were detected with pH up to 8, and the chromatographic peaks of SeCys2, MeSeCys and SeMet were not found with 40 mmol L −1 (NH 4 ) 2 HPO 4 as the mobile phase [32]. In addition, pH also influenced the peaks of various Se species.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…However, when the mobile phase was 40 mmol L −1 NH 4 H 2 PO 4 at pH 4.48, only SeCys, SeMet and Se (IV) were detected (Figure 1A); and only SeCys and Se (IV) was separated using 40 mmol L −1 NH 4 Ac at pH 6.94 and 40 mmol L −1 NH 4 NO 3 at pH 5.18 as the mobile phase as shown in Figure 1B and Figure 1C. The Se (VI) were not eluted because of their higher charge on the species under the eluent pH used, leading to their strong retention on the column [29,30]. On the other hand, competing anions such as Acand NO 3 were too weak to elute SeMet and Se(VI) from the column [23].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%