2016
DOI: 10.1177/1045389x16651156
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Input-dependent performance study of a nonlinear piezoelectric energy harvester

Abstract: This work reports an input-dependent performance study of a nonlinear piezoelectric energy harvester with introduced magnetic interaction. The performances of the novel harvester with two external magnet arrays (I and II) are compared. Array II that has symmetric magnetic force yields better voltage output under frequency sweep test. As such, the energy harvesting capacity with Array II is performed under two vibration inputs (I and II). Under excitation Input I with periodic varying frequency, experimental re… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 21 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The device exhibited a strong softening effect when it was subjected to the magnetic field. When the load resistance was 4.7 MΩ and the SMSE thicknesses was 5 mm, the corresponding power was 0.11 μW over a wide frequency range at an acceleration level of 0.3 g. Deng and Wang reported an input-dependent performance study of a nonlinear piezoelectric energy harvester with introduced magnetic interaction [ 105 ]. The performances of this harvester with two external magnet arrays (I and II) were compared.…”
Section: Monostable Energy Harvestersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The device exhibited a strong softening effect when it was subjected to the magnetic field. When the load resistance was 4.7 MΩ and the SMSE thicknesses was 5 mm, the corresponding power was 0.11 μW over a wide frequency range at an acceleration level of 0.3 g. Deng and Wang reported an input-dependent performance study of a nonlinear piezoelectric energy harvester with introduced magnetic interaction [ 105 ]. The performances of this harvester with two external magnet arrays (I and II) were compared.…”
Section: Monostable Energy Harvestersmentioning
confidence: 99%