The 1st IEEE Global Conference on Consumer Electronics 2012 2012
DOI: 10.1109/gcce.2012.6379627
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Input impedance characteristics of wearable transmitter electrodes for intra-body communication

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
6
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
2
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…2) The electric field is mainly confined to the outer layers of the arm in the range from 1 kHz to 100 MHz, evidencing that the far-field component, associated to radiation, could be neglected, as was also concluded in [21] and [29]. In this paper, it has been also found that the electric field is mainly confined in the skin up to 1 MHz, and that it only decreases about 5 dB up to 100 MHz.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 78%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…2) The electric field is mainly confined to the outer layers of the arm in the range from 1 kHz to 100 MHz, evidencing that the far-field component, associated to radiation, could be neglected, as was also concluded in [21] and [29]. In this paper, it has been also found that the electric field is mainly confined in the skin up to 1 MHz, and that it only decreases about 5 dB up to 100 MHz.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 78%
“…It can be seen that as the frequency increases, the magnitude decreases and the phase has an inflexion point at approximately 20 kHz. Even when bioimpedance results have not usually been reported in the IBC literature [20]- [23], these results agree well with those simulated in [29] as well as with experimental measurements carried out in [30]. In addition, the results adequately fit a three-dispersion Cole model (5), as shown in Fig.…”
Section: A Bioimpedancesupporting
confidence: 85%
“…In the literature, devices with input resistances of 1 MΩ and 50 Ω [29,38,139] have been considered indistinctly. In the specific case of galvanic coupling, the impedance seen before and after the measuring device is that of the electrode-skin interface, which is frequency dependent [9,38,140,164,165]. Therefore, the use of electronic equipment with input resistances of 50 Ω may not be an optimal option since an impedance mismatch with respect to that shown by the skin could exist, therefore leading to lower values of received signal and channel gain.…”
Section: Measurement Issues and Experimental Characterizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The electrodes in IBC are analogous to antennas in airborne wireless communication systems [140]. This is why they play a very important role in IBC communication.…”
Section: Electrodes and Body Couplingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The one electrode is connected to the ground, while the second one is connected to the output pin. The coupler's position on the human body influences the communication too [16,17]. In our experiments, the pair of the transmitter's electrodes was placed along the hand.…”
Section: Hardware Implementation and Experimental Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%