2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.sysconle.2011.04.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Input–output properties of the Page–Hinkley detector

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

2
1
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
2
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Remark 1.8. Our results are also closely related to those of [5]. If , ∈ ℕ is a bounded sequence of i.i.d.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 79%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Remark 1.8. Our results are also closely related to those of [5]. If , ∈ ℕ is a bounded sequence of i.i.d.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 79%
“…If , ∈ ℕ is a bounded sequence of i.i.d. random variables and , ∈ ℕ is bounded with a certain strong mixing property (see ( 10) and (11) in [5]) then Theorem 2 of [5] shows that , ∈ ℕ satisfies a mixing property implying, in particular, a law of large numbers for averages of Φ( ), for Lipschitz functionals Φ. Our results thus complement those of [5]: we establish the existence of a limiting law and even allow certain cases where the are unbounded.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 60%
“…It can be shown-following the line of thoughts presented in [44]-that under the hypothesis of no-change, h T is L-mixing, and the false alarm probability is exponentially decaying in δ: P(h T ≥ δ) ≤ Ce −aδ with some a > 0. Hence the false alarm rate itself is exponentially decaying in δ.…”
Section: Detecting Change Between Urban Road Environments and Locatin...mentioning
confidence: 96%