2015 10th Asian Control Conference (ASCC) 2015
DOI: 10.1109/ascc.2015.7244565
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Input-shaped model reference control of a nonlinear time-varying double-pendulum crane

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Input shaping is one of the most used open loop techniques, mostly based on a linearized system, that can be applied in real time, mainly for control of the oscillations of the payload. Anti-swing crane controls using input shaping have been widely implemented in the literature [5]- [6]. Concerning closed loop techniques, Proportional Integral Derivative (PID) control laws have been proposed for instance in [4], where the authors proposed a position control of a gantry crane system.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Input shaping is one of the most used open loop techniques, mostly based on a linearized system, that can be applied in real time, mainly for control of the oscillations of the payload. Anti-swing crane controls using input shaping have been widely implemented in the literature [5]- [6]. Concerning closed loop techniques, Proportional Integral Derivative (PID) control laws have been proposed for instance in [4], where the authors proposed a position control of a gantry crane system.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the nonlinear spectra, optimal control based methods have been used, like model predictive control (Wu et al, 2015;Jolevski and Bego, 2015;Käpernick and Graichen, 2013;Khatamianfar and Savkin, 2014;Vukov et al, 2012;Chen et al, 2016;Smoczek and Szpytko, 2017) and the linear quadratic Gaussian predictive approach (Spathopoulos and Fragopoulos, 2004;2001;Smoczek, 2015). The other well established nonlinear methods that have been applied due to their robustness are adaptive control (Nguyen et al, 2015;Cho and Lee, 2008;Fang et al, 2012;Sun et al, 2014;Yang and Shen, 2011;Tar et al, 2010;Fujioka and Singhose, 2015a;Fujioka et al, 2015;Lee et al, 2013) and sliding mode control.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In recent years, a lot of attention has focused on underactuated overhead crane systems, and many useful and constructive results have been obtained (Chen et al, 2016; Lee et al, 2015; Park et al, 2008; Sun et al 2018a; Zhang et al, 2016). Roughly speaking, control methods for overhead crane systems can be sorted as open-loop control methods (Blackbum et al, 2010; Blajer and Kolodziejczyk, 2007; Fujioka and Singhose, 2015; Garrido et al 2008; Maghsoudi et al, 2016; Naidu, 2003; Singhose, 2009; Sun et al, 2018b; Wu and Xia, 2014; Zhang et al, 2016a) and closed-loop ones (Chwa, 2009; Fang et al, 2003, 2012; Huang et al, 2015; Le et al, 2012; Leban et al, 2015; Smoczek, 2014; Solihin et al, 2010; Sun and Fang, 2014; Sun et al, 2014; Van den Broeck et al, 2011; Wu et al, 2016; Zhao and Gao, 2012; Zhang et al, 2016b; Zhang et al, 2018). Specifically, for open-loop control methods, by analyzing the coupling relationship between the actuated trolley translation and the unactuated payload swing, the commands can be predefined; some representative open-loop control method are input shaping (Blackbum et al, 2010; Fujioka and Singhose, 2015; Garrido et al, 2008; Singhose, 2009), optimal control (Maghsoudi et al, 2016; Naidu, 2003; Wu and Xia, 2014), trajectory planning (Blajer and Kolodziejczyk, 2007; Sun et al, 2012; Sun et al, 2018c; Zhang et al, 2016a), differential flatness-based control (Zhang et al, 2017), and so forth.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%