2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.automatica.2005.06.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Input-to-state stability for discrete-time time-varying systems with applications to robust stabilization of systems in power form

Abstract: Input-to-state stability (ISS) of a parameterized family of discrete-time time-varying nonlinear systems is investigated. A converse Lyapunov theorem for such systems is developed. We consider parameterized families of discrete-time systems and concentrate on a semiglobal practical type of stability that naturally arises when an approximate discrete-time model is used to design a controller for a sampled-data system. An application of our main result to time-varying periodic systems is presented, and this is u… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
35
0
1

Year Published

2008
2008
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
35
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…and for any a ∈ R + , there exists a K + -class functionγ satisfying (9). Then, HDS (1) has the first ISS property.…”
Section: Thain213mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…and for any a ∈ R + , there exists a K + -class functionγ satisfying (9). Then, HDS (1) has the first ISS property.…”
Section: Thain213mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…ISS has been successfully employed in the stability analysis and control synthesis of nonlinear systems. These works mainly focused on the following topics related to the study of the ISS property: feedback ISS stabilization for nonlinear systems [2,4,[9][10]13], ISS nonlinear small gain results for nonlinear systems [6,17,18], ISS for sampleddata systems [8], ISS problem using averaging technique [7], ISS properties of networked control systems [5], ISS for discrete-time systems [3], ISS for impulsive systems in [11][12]37], and ISS for time-delay systems in [14][15][16]39].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The notions of UIOS and UISS were formulated in [39,40,41,44,45] for finite-dimensional systems described by ordinary differential equations. More recently, sufficient conditions for semiglobal practical UISS were studied in [24,25] for sampled-data systems. In the present work, the sufficient conditions will be expressed in terms of a scalar and in terms of a vector Lyapunov function.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Teel and others, see [10,11,20,24,25,[31][32][33][34][35][36][37]49]). The results obtained in this way lead to a systematic procedure for the construction of practical, semi-global feedback stabilizers and provide a list of possible reasons that explain the occasional failure of sampled-data control mechanisms.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A range of tools has been developed to aid the controller design within this framework: construction of appropriate strict Lyapunov functions via change of supply rates techniques [15,26,27], stability of cascaded systems [23,24] and Matrosov theorem [22]. These results were used, for instance, to construct controllers based on approximate models using backstepping [25], optimization based stabilization [7], model predictive control [5], nonholonomic systems [13] and port controlled Hamiltonian systems [14]. Simulation comparisons in these references invariably show that controllers designed within our framework perform better than appropriate emulated controllers, see e.g.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%