1998
DOI: 10.1207/s1532690xci1601_2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Inquiry, Modeling, and Metacognition: Making Science Accessible to All Students

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

18
673
1
52

Year Published

1999
1999
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1,022 publications
(744 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
18
673
1
52
Order By: Relevance
“…Peer evaluation can help student assessors reßect on a series of criteria that indicate the good quality of the artifact involved in the learning task and later apply those criteria to their own task (Linn & Eylon, 2006;White & Frederiksen, 1998. Research shows that peer evaluation such as reßective assessment helps students improve the quality of their artifacts (White & Frederiksen, 1998 and the scores of younger and lower achieving students in achievement tests (White & Frederiksen, 1998. Moreover, peer evaluation allows students to understand that their models or artifacts need to be evaluated and improved toward valid scientiÞc models (Schwarz & White, 2005).…”
Section: Our Predictionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Peer evaluation can help student assessors reßect on a series of criteria that indicate the good quality of the artifact involved in the learning task and later apply those criteria to their own task (Linn & Eylon, 2006;White & Frederiksen, 1998. Research shows that peer evaluation such as reßective assessment helps students improve the quality of their artifacts (White & Frederiksen, 1998 and the scores of younger and lower achieving students in achievement tests (White & Frederiksen, 1998. Moreover, peer evaluation allows students to understand that their models or artifacts need to be evaluated and improved toward valid scientiÞc models (Schwarz & White, 2005).…”
Section: Our Predictionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, Chi et al (1989) found that students who engaged in self-explanations, engaged in more self-monitoring activities, and tended to be better problem solvers. White and Frederiksen (1998) found that low achieving students showed learning gains when engaged in metacognitive reflection. Metacognition has also been identified as a critical component of self-regulated learning (Butler et al, 2011).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Next, some studies showed the necessity of metacognition for students to develop scientific knowledge through exploration (Chinn & Malhotra, 2002;White & Frederiksen, 1998). It was also a key in learning transfer and it can let students learn the learning method (Bransford & Schwartz, 1999).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%