2006
DOI: 10.1029/2005gl025109
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

InSAR constraints on the source parameters of the 2001 Bhuj earthquake

Abstract: We present InSAR results of the coseismic displacement field for the January 2001 Bhuj earthquake. Using InSAR data along multiple tracks, we determine the optimal source parameters of the earthquake. The deformation pattern is first modeled assuming uniform slip on an elastic dislocation. A grid search is used to constrain the source location and finiteness assuming a strike, rake, and dip consistent with seismic studies. An inversion for the distributed slip places oblique reverse slip at depth with strike‐s… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
33
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
2
33
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The comparison of the observed interferometric picture and modeled scheme of earthquake deformations shows many similar details ( Figure 5). Similar images have been obtained for all the significant earthquakes of the last decade: Neftegorsk, 1995, Russia [18], Bhuj, 2001, India [19]; Bam, 2003, Iran [20]; Sumatra (2004), Indonesia [21] etc. All these cases demonstrate co-seismic and post-seismic deformations.…”
Section: Insarsupporting
confidence: 63%
“…The comparison of the observed interferometric picture and modeled scheme of earthquake deformations shows many similar details ( Figure 5). Similar images have been obtained for all the significant earthquakes of the last decade: Neftegorsk, 1995, Russia [18], Bhuj, 2001, India [19]; Bam, 2003, Iran [20]; Sumatra (2004), Indonesia [21] etc. All these cases demonstrate co-seismic and post-seismic deformations.…”
Section: Insarsupporting
confidence: 63%
“…Table 3. Black triangles (on the hanging wall), locations of the fault responsible for the 2001 Bhuj M w 7.6 earthquake (Schmidt and Bürgmann, 2006) and the Allah Bund fault (Malik et al, 2001); dashed line, location of the inferred Island Belt fault (Malik et al, 2001); filled circles, felt-intensity locations within 300 km of the epicenter; arrows, the change in epicentral location due to changes outlined in Table 3. Contours represent magnitudes from the epicentral location algorithm (Data and Methods) using the raw intensity data; they indicate a minimum magnitude location in the Gulf of Kachchh.…”
Section: Case Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the estimation of ΔCFS, we used the distributed slip model as obtained from the inversion of InSAR data where the majority of slip confines within a 20 × 20 km region centred at a depth of 20 km (Schmidt & Burggmann 2006). The considered blind thrust fault plane whose down‐dip width and along strike length are 20 km and 20 km, respectively, is discretized into square subfaults with a dimension of 1 km resulting in an average slip of 14.8 m (Schmidt & Burggmann 2006). It will be important to note that the GF began to experience M w ≥ 4 events since 2003 August 5, and until 2006 March 6, another four earthquakes of M w = 4–4.7 have occurred along GF.…”
Section: Source Process and Static Stress Changesmentioning
confidence: 99%