2018
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-75937-1_12
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Insect-Fungus Interactions in Dead Wood Systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
60
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

4
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 53 publications
(61 citation statements)
references
References 199 publications
1
60
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Filamentous fungi are generally known to be common symbionts of bark and ambrosia beetles (Curculionidae: Scolytinae and Platypodinae). While many species use beetles for dissemination with apparently little benefits for their vectors ( Birkemoe et al, 2018 ; Seibold et al, 2019 ) other fungi are essential for the beetles like nutritional or tree-defenses-detoxifying mutualists as well as tree-defenses-stimulating fungi (e.g., Six, 2003 ; Lieutier et al, 2009 ; Kandasamy et al, 2019 ; Biedermann and Vega, 2020 ). The most famous nutritional mutualisms are those between xylem-colonizing ambrosia beetles and various “ambrosia fungus” species in the ascomycete orders Hypocreales, Microascales and Ophiostomatales as well as phloem-colonizing Dendroctonus bark beetles and their basidiomycete and ascomycete mutualists in the orders Russulales and Ophiostomatales ( Barras and Perry, 1972 ; Six and Paine, 1998 ; Six and Klepzig, 2004 ; Harrington, 2005 ; Kirkendall et al, 2015 ; Biedermann and Vega, 2020 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Filamentous fungi are generally known to be common symbionts of bark and ambrosia beetles (Curculionidae: Scolytinae and Platypodinae). While many species use beetles for dissemination with apparently little benefits for their vectors ( Birkemoe et al, 2018 ; Seibold et al, 2019 ) other fungi are essential for the beetles like nutritional or tree-defenses-detoxifying mutualists as well as tree-defenses-stimulating fungi (e.g., Six, 2003 ; Lieutier et al, 2009 ; Kandasamy et al, 2019 ; Biedermann and Vega, 2020 ). The most famous nutritional mutualisms are those between xylem-colonizing ambrosia beetles and various “ambrosia fungus” species in the ascomycete orders Hypocreales, Microascales and Ophiostomatales as well as phloem-colonizing Dendroctonus bark beetles and their basidiomycete and ascomycete mutualists in the orders Russulales and Ophiostomatales ( Barras and Perry, 1972 ; Six and Paine, 1998 ; Six and Klepzig, 2004 ; Harrington, 2005 ; Kirkendall et al, 2015 ; Biedermann and Vega, 2020 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This suggests that the availability of fungal resources is a potential determinant of differences in beetle successional trajectories between habitats. Beetle–fungi interactions is emerging as an important research frontier in the study of saproxylic organisms and wood degradation (Birkemoe et al 2018 ; Jacobsen et al 2018a , b ; Biedermann et al 2019 ; Six et al 2019 ) and elucidating the effects of the abiotic environment on these interactions is an important challenge for the future (see also below).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… Notodoma lewisi is a fungivorous species. Fungi can provide insects with nutrients and essential elements, and in recently dead wood they detoxify plant defenses and provide protection ( Birkemoe et al 2018 ). Such beetles might serve as a dispersal vector for dead-wood-inhabiting fungi.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%