2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.cois.2015.01.014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Insect host plant selection in complex environments

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
113
0
2

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 141 publications
(115 citation statements)
references
References 61 publications
0
113
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…, Carrasco et al. ). The distinction between both aspects of herbivore response to PGD is not trivial because herbivore recruitment and actual plant consumption likely respond to different drivers (e.g., relative frequency of more or less palatable plants, plant nutritional quality, top‐down control of natural enemies; Moreira et al.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…, Carrasco et al. ). The distinction between both aspects of herbivore response to PGD is not trivial because herbivore recruitment and actual plant consumption likely respond to different drivers (e.g., relative frequency of more or less palatable plants, plant nutritional quality, top‐down control of natural enemies; Moreira et al.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…, Carrasco et al. ). The amount of competitors on a given plant, together with induced plant defenses, is likely to change rank order preference in foraging insects (Utsumi et al.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…This strategy has been proposed, for multivoltine species, as an adaptation to environments where the composition of plant communities varies over space and time in an unpredictable way (Wiklund and Friberg 2009). Despite its advantages, this strategy comes at a cost: when a large number of plant species are suitable, a relationship between sensory cues and suitability would be either non-existent or too complex for insect neural analytical capacity (Bernays 2001;Carrasco et al 2015). Indeed, it has long been noted that polyphagous females frequently make maladaptive oviposition site choices, and lay their eggs on plant species that are not always optimal for the development of their offspring.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Plant-derived cues play a role in host-plant selection by herbivorous insects and influence behaviors crucial to insect fitness and survival, such as feeding, mating, and oviposition (Bruce et al 2005; Carrasco et al 2015). In 1978, Jaenicke hypothesized that host-choice in phytophagous insects is mainly the responsibility of ovipositing females, who should choose plants that would maximize survival and performance of their offspring (“preference-performance” or “mother knows best” hypothesis) (Jaenike 1978).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this context, polyphagous insects may benefit from experience-dependent behavioral plasticity in their host-selection process (Anderson and Anton 2014; Bernays 2001; Carrasco et al 2015). …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%