2022
DOI: 10.1186/s40104-021-00671-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Insects as alternative feed for ruminants: comparison of protein evaluation methods

Abstract: Background The high dependence of intensive ruminant production on soybean meal and the environmental impact of this crop encourage the search for alternative protein-rich feeds. The use of insects seems promising, but the extent of their ruminal protein degradation is largely unknown. This parameter has major influence not only on N utilization efficiency but also on the environmental burden of ruminant farming. In addition, although assessing ruminal N degradation represents a key first step … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
17
0
6

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
0
17
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…Even though, the CP content of our samples were in line with those published in literature on the same species [ 42 , 46 ]. When comparing the CP values of insect meals with published literature, the N:P conversion factor used for CP calculation must be considered [ 9 ]. When using the conventional N:P conversion factor of 6.25, it is assumed that the matrix under analysis contains 160 g N/kg CP, and that all N is of protein origin.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Even though, the CP content of our samples were in line with those published in literature on the same species [ 42 , 46 ]. When comparing the CP values of insect meals with published literature, the N:P conversion factor used for CP calculation must be considered [ 9 ]. When using the conventional N:P conversion factor of 6.25, it is assumed that the matrix under analysis contains 160 g N/kg CP, and that all N is of protein origin.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The use of insects for monogastric feeding is increasing worldwide [ 5 ]. Even if their use for ruminant nutrition is limited in some countries due to the potential risk of Transmissible Spongiform Encephalopathies for humans [ 8 ], the interest in their use is growing up, as they are seen as promising alternative protein sources [ 9 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Low N degradation in the rumen may represent a positive aspect for ruminant nutrition purposes, if associated with a high intestinal digestibility. Toral et al (2022) found that the in vitro intestinal digestibility of the N non-degraded inside the rumen ranged from 64% in A. diaperinus to 78% in T. molitor, thus demonstrating the potential of the four tested insects as alternative feedstuffs for ruminants.…”
Section: Digestibility and Methanogenesismentioning
confidence: 89%
“…When evaluating insects as potential feed ingredients for ruminants, fundamental aspects to consider are related to protein, specifically the extent of ruminal protein degradation and the extent of intestinal digestibility of the protein not degraded inside the rumen. This was the goal of the work recently conducted by Toral et al (2022) who, using three different methodologies, investigated the potential of four insect species (T. molitor, Zophobas morio, Alphitobius diaperinus and A. domesticus) as alternative protein sources for ruminants. These authors showed that the ruminal degradation of insect nitrogen (N) ranged, on average, from 46% for T. molitor to 74% for Z. morio, such values being lower than that of SBM (>85%) used by the authors as reference feedstuff.…”
Section: Digestibility and Methanogenesismentioning
confidence: 99%