2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmgm.2008.11.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Inside the Hsp90 inhibitors binding mode through induced fit docking

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
18
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
1
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Schrodinger's Induced Fit Docking (IFD) Workflow (23,24) involves rigid receptor docking with Glide (25,26), combined with protein-ligand complex minimization with the homology modeling module Prime (24). IFD has been successfully used for studies of kinases (27,28), HIV-1 Integrase (29), heat shock protein 90 (30), monoacylglycerol lipase (31).…”
Section: Receptor Flexibility By Monte Carlo (Mc) Simulations and Rotmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Schrodinger's Induced Fit Docking (IFD) Workflow (23,24) involves rigid receptor docking with Glide (25,26), combined with protein-ligand complex minimization with the homology modeling module Prime (24). IFD has been successfully used for studies of kinases (27,28), HIV-1 Integrase (29), heat shock protein 90 (30), monoacylglycerol lipase (31).…”
Section: Receptor Flexibility By Monte Carlo (Mc) Simulations and Rotmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…208–212 The engagement of a client protein with the HSP70/HSP40/HSP90 complex and p60 HOP forms the HSP90 multichaperone complex, in which functional conformation and activation of the client protein require the binding of ATP to the N-terminal domain of HSP90. 208,212214 Several oncogenic proteins are regulated by HSP90, including c-kit, HER-2, FLT3, BCR-ABL, ZAP-70, Akt, NPM-ALK, Raf-1, and mutated TP53. 209,215–222 High HSP90 levels were identified in many solid tumors.…”
Section: Hsp90mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This software generates information on the binding site's characteristics using novel search and analytical facilities: a SiteMap calculation begins with an initial search step which identifies or characterizes, through the use of a grid points, one or more regions on the protein surface that may be suitable for binding of ligands to the receptor. Then contour maps are generated, producing hydrophobic and hydrophilic maps (Lauria et al, 2009). The hydrophilic maps are further divided into donor, acceptor, and metal-binding regions.…”
Section: Active Site Predictionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The hydrophilic maps are further divided into donor, acceptor, and metal-binding regions. The evaluation stage, which concludes the calculation, assesses each site by calculating various properties: number of site points, a measure of the site size; exposure/ enclosure, two properties providing different measures of how available is the site to the solvent; contact, which measures how strongly the average site point interacts with the surrounding receptor via van der Waals non-bonded interactions; donor/acceptor character, a property related to the sizes and intensities of H-donor and -acceptor regions; SiteScore, an overall property based on previous properties, constructed and calibrated so that the average SiteScore for a promising binding site is 1.0 (Lauria et al, 2009).…”
Section: Active Site Predictionsmentioning
confidence: 99%