Insight and psychotic experiences in patients with non-psychotic depression (eng)

Herdi, Oğuzhan; Berksun, Oğuz E.

doi:10.5505/kpd.2021.67625

Cited by 1 publication

(1 citation statement)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…In initial studies with undergraduate psychology student samples, the SRIS demonstrated sound factor structure, good convergent and divergent validity and good test-retest reliability (Grant et al, 2002). Since this initial validation, the SRIS has been utilised across a range of populations including medical students (Naeimi et al, 2019), nurses (Aydin et al, 2023), individuals living with depression (Herdi & Berksun, 2021) and young people in a therapeutic context (Sauter et al, 2010). It has been translated and used in a number of languages (e.g., As ¸kun & Çetin, 2017;Naeimi et al).…”

Section: Measures Of Self-reflectionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Reliability and validity of the Self‐Reflection and Insight Scale for psychologists and the development and validation of the revised short version

Banner,

Rice,

Schutte

et al. 2023

Clin Psychology and Psychoth

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Self‐reflection is broadly considered a core competency for psychologists; however, there is an absence of measures of self‐reflection, limiting the extent to which self‐reflection can be assessed in both research and practice contexts. Whilst the Self‐Reflection and Insight Scale (Grant et al., 2002) has been validated in a range of formats with different populations, it has not yet been validated with psychologists. Further, the psychometric properties of a short version of the scale (Silvia, 2021) have not been examined for use with psychologists. This study tested the factor structure, internal consistency and convergent and divergent validity of the Self‐Reflection and Insight Scale with registered psychologists (N = 123), finding both the full scale and short version to have sound psychometrics. However, as there were low loading items across both versions of the measure, and the short version also excluded high‐loading items, the SRIS‐Revised (SRIS‐R) was formed through model improvement, retaining a total of 14 items. This revised version of the scale captures high loading items without redundancy of low‐loading items, resulting in a measure that parsimoniously captures the construct of self‐reflection as relevant to psychologists. The SRIS‐R demonstrated good internal consistency (α = .882), convergent, divergent and construct validity. Scores on the SRIS‐R were used to test whether there was a correlation between self‐reflection and years of professional registration, with this not being significant.

show abstract