1995
DOI: 10.1097/00005053-199512000-00004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Insight in Schizophrenia and Mania

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

2
12
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
2
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…(19) previously reported a correlation between lack of insight and visual memory in 16 patients with mania, which was suggested to indicate frontal lobe dysfunction. Previous studies have also examined insight and neurocognitive performance in groups of manic (17, 20–24) and remitted (25–27) bipolar patients, although findings are inconsistent. Most recently, Varga et al.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(19) previously reported a correlation between lack of insight and visual memory in 16 patients with mania, which was suggested to indicate frontal lobe dysfunction. Previous studies have also examined insight and neurocognitive performance in groups of manic (17, 20–24) and remitted (25–27) bipolar patients, although findings are inconsistent. Most recently, Varga et al.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A state‐dependent phenomenon is characterized by change along with symptom severity. Previous studies dealt with this issue by comparing levels of insight at admission for mania and at discharge (12, 16–18, 25). Our study extended those observations by beginning with a state of remission.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Insight was evaluated with the Insight and Treatment Attitudes Questionnaire (ITAQ), an 11-item rating scale to evaluate patient recognition of illness and need for treatment in psychiatric illness. The ITAQ has been widely utilized in both populations with schizophrenia and bipolar disorder [40,41,42,43]. Each ITAQ item is scored on a 0 to 2 scale (0 = no insight, 2 = good insight), and the scale has high inter-rater reliability (r=0.82, p<.001) [44].…”
Section: Specific Measuresmentioning
confidence: 99%