2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2018.11.015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Insight May Limit Identification of Eating Disorders

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…More recently, in a secondary analysis of a nationally representative sample of U.S. adults using data from the 2012–2013 National Epidemiologic Survey on Alcohol and Related Conditions (NESARC‐III), reported DSM‐5 lifetime estimates for AN, BN, and BED were 0.80%, 0.28%, and 0.85%, respectively (Udo & Grilo, 2018). These latter estimates may be underestimates given limitations of the NESARC‐III method of assessing eating disorders (Brodrick & McAdams, 2019).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More recently, in a secondary analysis of a nationally representative sample of U.S. adults using data from the 2012–2013 National Epidemiologic Survey on Alcohol and Related Conditions (NESARC‐III), reported DSM‐5 lifetime estimates for AN, BN, and BED were 0.80%, 0.28%, and 0.85%, respectively (Udo & Grilo, 2018). These latter estimates may be underestimates given limitations of the NESARC‐III method of assessing eating disorders (Brodrick & McAdams, 2019).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, assessment of eating disorders and related comorbidities may increase the assessment length and may cause interview fatigue. With these complexities in mind [60,62–64], we echo the arguments of Streatfeild et al [3 ▪ ] that population-based estimates are important data sources to advocate for more resource allocation to eating disorders, and that population health surveillance and reporting of health services data are key areas where policy and public health efforts should be substantially increased.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 79%
“…A few of the studies included in this article (other than those with Udo and Grilo) utilized the original diagnostic coding provided by the NESARC-III. This issue, along with the findings of prevalence estimates being lower than expected by some, has led to some questions regarding the validity of the NESARC-III-based study findings (e.g., [62]; see [60] for reply). NESARC-III also does not address the need for population-based studies for adolescents as respondents had to be 18 years or older, although this gap is being addressed by the on-going ABCD study [30,31 ▪▪ ].…”
Section: Limitations and Future Research Directionsmentioning
confidence: 98%