1997
DOI: 10.1007/s001220050466
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Insight on segregation distortions in two intraspecific crosses between annual species of Medicago (Leguminosae)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

10
87
2

Year Published

2003
2003
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 135 publications
(99 citation statements)
references
References 65 publications
10
87
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Here we report that 45% of the loci in our mapping population deviated significantly from the 1:1 expectation (Table 3; Figure 3). This estimate is similar to that found in intraspecific crosses in angiosperms (Zamir and Tadmor 1986;Jenczewski et al 1997;Lu et al 2000;Fishman et al 2001;Harushima et al 2001;Schwarz-Sommer et al 2003;Kuittinen et al 2004;Hall and Willis 2005;Bratteler et al 2006). The distorted loci tended to be clustered along the linkage groups; 6 of the 12 regions showing significant distortion contained at least three markers, suggesting that the distorted markers were nonrandomly distributed throughout the genome (Figure 3).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 85%
“…Here we report that 45% of the loci in our mapping population deviated significantly from the 1:1 expectation (Table 3; Figure 3). This estimate is similar to that found in intraspecific crosses in angiosperms (Zamir and Tadmor 1986;Jenczewski et al 1997;Lu et al 2000;Fishman et al 2001;Harushima et al 2001;Schwarz-Sommer et al 2003;Kuittinen et al 2004;Hall and Willis 2005;Bratteler et al 2006). The distorted loci tended to be clustered along the linkage groups; 6 of the 12 regions showing significant distortion contained at least three markers, suggesting that the distorted markers were nonrandomly distributed throughout the genome (Figure 3).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 85%
“…A much smaller proportion of markers (16; 14.81%) showed a significant deficiency (a ¼ 0.05) of one of the parental genotypes compared to that among DHLs (26.89%), although a direct comparison is difficult because of much lower statistical power among F 2 's. Nonetheless, the proportions of markers with distorted parental genotypic ratios among DHLs and F 2 's are comparable to that of some intraspecific crosses ½13À18% (Zamir and Tadmor 1986;Jenczewski et al 1997;Lu et al 2002), but much lower than that of some interspecific crosses; 80% (Devicente and Tanksley 1993); 49% (Fishman et al 2001a). Of 16 markers with distorted parental genotypic ratios among F 2 's, 11 showed overrepresentation of FN8 genotypes, again consistent with the trend among DHLs.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…On chromosome VII, alleles from the cultivated parent were overrepresented on the short arm and the prox imal region of the long arm, whereas alleles from the wild parent were overrepresented on the long arm. Segregation distortion is common in wide crosses in the angiosperms, especially interspecies crosses 25,26 , and may reflect reproductive barriers or inadvertent selection during the inbreeding process. Previous studies have shown that segrega tion distortion does not affect marker order determination 27,28 , as confirmed in this study by the excellent concordance between the genetic map and the sequence assembly, including in regions where segregation distortion was observed.…”
Section: A Genetic Map For Setariamentioning
confidence: 99%