Insights into food system exposure, coping capacity and adaptive capacity

Abstract

Purpose The purpose of this paper is to consider the concepts of exposure, coping capacity and adaptive capacity as a multiple structure of vulnerability in order to distinguish and interpret short-term coping responses and long-term strategic responses to food system vulnerability. Design/methodology/approach This paper applies an abductive approach for qualitative analysis of data, which were collected through 18 semi-structured interviews among Finnish food system actors. Findings The findings suggest that coping capacity and adaptive capacity are indeed two different concepts, which both need to be addressed in the examination of food system vulnerability. Public and private food system governance and related decision-making processes seem to focus on building short-term coping capacity rather than strategic adaptive capacity. In fact, conservative and protective policies can be counterproductive in terms of building genuine adaptive capacity in the food system, highlighting institutional and policy failures as limiting adaptive capacity and affecting future vulnerability. Originality/value This paper is the first to provide evidence on the multiple structure of food system vulnerability. It simultaneously considers the external aspect (vulnerability drivers) and internal factors, including short term coping capacity and more strategic adaptive capacity, as key determinants of vulnerability.

What’s on the menu? A global assessment of MUFPP signatory cities’ food strategies

“…Persistent food insecurity, the food system's harmful impacts on climate and environment, worldwide increases of non-communicable diseases, and insecure livelihoods of those working in the food chain, have, among other food-related pressures and challenges, been subject to fierce debate in recent years (Lang and Heasman 2015;Paarlberg 2013). Increased recognition of the persistent and interconnected nature of many food system determinants and challenges have resulted in calls for a transition towards a more sustainable, equitable, and/or healthier food system (EEA 2017;Kampers and Fresco 2017;Maye and Duncan 2017;Paloviita et al 2017). With this purpose in mind, governments have shown mounting interest in developing integrated food policy: policy efforts that foster concerted action across sectors and levels to steer food systems into desired directions (Candel 2018;Marsden 2010).…”

Transitions through the dynamics of adaptive cycles: Evolution of the Finnish agrifood system

“…The trade balance of agricultural and food products is negative and has been in a linear decline since accession to the EU: about − 0.5 billion euros in 1995, − 1 billion euros in 1998, − 2 billion euros in 2008, and − 3 billion euros in 2017 (Niemi and Väre, 2019). The increasing concentration throughout the agrifood system has created oligopolistic markets, where the ownership of the input suppliers, food processors and wholesale trade has become more centralised and partly transferred to international operators and the power of trade has strengthened in relation to other actors (Muilu et al, 2016;Paloviita et al, 2017;Arovuori, 2022). Sanctions placed upon Russia in 2014 by the EU stopped eastern dairy exports and have ever since put further downward pressure on the prices of dairy products.…”

Sodan kokemukset synnyttivät kotivaran

“…11.) Ensimmäisiä ja osin alustavia arvioita covid 19pandemian vaikutuksesta koko ruokajärjes telmän haavoittuvuuteen (44), kuluttajien osto käyttäytymiseen (esim. [45][46] ja ruokailun jär jestämiseen kotitalouksissa (47) on julkaistu.…”