2020
DOI: 10.1007/s00348-020-03034-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Insights into leading edge vortex formation and detachment on a pitching and plunging flat plate

Abstract: The present study is a prelude to applying different flow control devices on pitching and plunging airfoils with the intention of controlling the growth of the leading edge vortex (LEV); hence, the lift under unsteady stall conditions. As a pre-requisite the parameters influencing the development of the LEV topology must be fully understood and this constitutes the main motivation of the present experimental investigation. The aims of this study are twofold. First, an approach is introduced to validate the com… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is defined as α * = αss c/U, where αss is the angular velocity of the pitching manoeuvre at the static stall angle. This parameter has been shown to describe the dynamic stall behaviour in various studies (Mulleners & Raffel 2012;Kissing et al 2020;Le Fouest, Deparday & Mulleners 2021). However, due to the symmetry of the sine function about its mean value, the magnitude of the instantaneous effective unsteadiness is identical for test cases at mean angles equidistant to the static stall angle.…”
Section: Measure Of Unsteadinessmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is defined as α * = αss c/U, where αss is the angular velocity of the pitching manoeuvre at the static stall angle. This parameter has been shown to describe the dynamic stall behaviour in various studies (Mulleners & Raffel 2012;Kissing et al 2020;Le Fouest, Deparday & Mulleners 2021). However, due to the symmetry of the sine function about its mean value, the magnitude of the instantaneous effective unsteadiness is identical for test cases at mean angles equidistant to the static stall angle.…”
Section: Measure Of Unsteadinessmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a result, the vorticity feeding rate of the dynamic stall vortex decreases and the vortex lifts-off from the surface. Vortex lift-off occurs when the vortex has grown strong enough such that secondary vortices of opposite-signed vorticity emerge between the vortex and the blade's surface (figure 6(a)) or when the effective inflow velocity decreases and drops below the self-induced velocity of the vortex [31,32]. Even though the dynamic stall vortex and the circulation in the field of view continues to increase for 0.25 ≤ t/T < 0.4, the tangential force coefficient drops as the vortex is no longer bound to the blade.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As the pitch rate varies continuously for a sinusoidal motion, we use the instantaneous pitch rate at the time the static stall angle is exceeded as the representative effective pitch rate for the sinusoidal motions [12,14,13]. The effective pitch rates for the sinusoidal motions vary between 0.0035 and 0.02.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The angular delay of flow separation is considered one of the classical hallmarks of dynamic stall [5]. From a timing perspective however, high pitch rates promote flow separation and reduce the blade's reaction time relative to the static case [12,13].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%