“…[43,63] The value for α derived from the current dataset is 4.3, somewhat higher than the previously reported for silica aerogels, e.g., 3.6 [43] and 3.7 [63] from experiments or 3.61 from simulations, [64] and significantly higher than what is typical for many other aerogel systems, e.g., 1.75 for alumina aerogels, [60] 1.8 for cellulose aerogels, [61] or 2.7-3.7 for resorcinol-formaldehyde aerogels. [65,66] The E-modulus of the 2 h-aged aerogels is lower by a factor of 1.5-2.5 compared with the 24 h-aged counterparts of similar density, a direct consequence of the formation of thicker interparticle necks during the extended aging time, which increases the structural strength to the aerogel network. [35] Many industries use secant moduli σ 10 , σ 30 , σ 50 , and σ 80 , [67] i.e., the stress values for a given percentage of strain, rather than E-moduli to describe the sample deformation under stress.…”