2002
DOI: 10.1109/tns.2002.805439
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Insights on the transient response of fully and partially depleted SOI technologies under heavy-ion and dose-rate irradiations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
23
0
2

Year Published

2004
2004
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 87 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
23
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…This result demonstrates that even under a constantLET irradiation the widths of SET pulses fluctuatestrongly. This is reasonable because the position of the incident particle is entirely random during theHeavy Ion test, and the transient current response is affected seriously on the particleincident position in the device (such as a drain strike or a gate strike) (Cavrois and Gasiot, 2002).All of three kind devices have similar distribution of SET pulse width. Thismaybe due to similar device structure with roughly the same charge collection effects of single event in SOI device.…”
Section: Figure3mentioning
confidence: 91%
“…This result demonstrates that even under a constantLET irradiation the widths of SET pulses fluctuatestrongly. This is reasonable because the position of the incident particle is entirely random during theHeavy Ion test, and the transient current response is affected seriously on the particleincident position in the device (such as a drain strike or a gate strike) (Cavrois and Gasiot, 2002).All of three kind devices have similar distribution of SET pulse width. Thismaybe due to similar device structure with roughly the same charge collection effects of single event in SOI device.…”
Section: Figure3mentioning
confidence: 91%
“…This mechanism is comparable to the bipolar transistor effect in partially depleted SOI transistors (Massengill et al, 1990). Because bipolar amplification is less important for fully depleted than for partially depleted devices, circuits based on fully depleted transistors are less sensitive to singleevent upset than partially depleted circuits (Ferlet-Cavrois et al, 2002). The effect of the parasitic bipolar transistor in SOI devices is quantified using the bipolar gain, .…”
Section: Bipolar Amplificationmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…This can be explained by the huge deposited charge by the ion which masks the impact of other phenomena such as the electrostatic control by the gate. Previous experimental and theoretical studies showed that, generally, fully depleted SOIbased devices (with either single-or double-gate configuration) present reduced floating body effects and then lower bipolar amplification of the collected charge than partiallydepleted SOI devices (Ferlet-Cavrois et al, 2002;Ferlet-Cavrois et al, 2005). In Multiple-Gate devices the control of the channel by the gates is naturally reinforced, and reduces even more the floating body effects.…”
Section: Bipolar Amplificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The parasitic bipolar transistor still exists, but its gain is greatly reduced and less charge can be deposited in the thinner channel layer [78]. However, current amplification is still possible [79] and leads to significant single event effects.…”
Section: Single Event Effects In Soi Transistorsmentioning
confidence: 99%