2020
DOI: 10.1080/13632469.2019.1691679
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Instability of Thin Concrete Walls with a Single Layer of Reinforcement under Cyclic Loading: Numerical Simulation and Improved Equivalent Boundary Element Model for Assessment

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, during this latter program, only one wall configuration was considered and the longitudinal steel was significantly more ductile than typically used in Colombian construction practice. A more recent program [14,15] focused on uniaxial tension-compression tests on a series of 12 isolated boundary elements with different thicknesses, steel reinforcement ratios, and rebar eccentricities. These tests reported the behavior of specimens representing the boundary elements, but they evidently miss the effect of the entire wall; in particular, as discussed by Rosso et al [15], the influence of the vertical displacement profiles imposed on wall boundary elements is significantly distinct from the imposed displacement on uniaxial tests.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, during this latter program, only one wall configuration was considered and the longitudinal steel was significantly more ductile than typically used in Colombian construction practice. A more recent program [14,15] focused on uniaxial tension-compression tests on a series of 12 isolated boundary elements with different thicknesses, steel reinforcement ratios, and rebar eccentricities. These tests reported the behavior of specimens representing the boundary elements, but they evidently miss the effect of the entire wall; in particular, as discussed by Rosso et al [15], the influence of the vertical displacement profiles imposed on wall boundary elements is significantly distinct from the imposed displacement on uniaxial tests.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A more recent program [14,15] focused on uniaxial tension-compression tests on a series of 12 isolated boundary elements with different thicknesses, steel reinforcement ratios, and rebar eccentricities. These tests reported the behavior of specimens representing the boundary elements, but they evidently miss the effect of the entire wall; in particular, as discussed by Rosso et al [15], the influence of the vertical displacement profiles imposed on wall boundary elements is significantly distinct from the imposed displacement on uniaxial tests. McMenamin [16] carried out tests on several slender precast cantilever walls; however, only two of them had an M/VL w ratio of 2.5.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The effects of different parameters on the instability of singlyreinforced walls is also studied by Rosso et al [21]. The evolution of out-of-plane instability was also observed in several limited ductile walls tested by Menegon et al [22].…”
mentioning
confidence: 88%
“…More details on these aspects can be referred in Sritharan et al (2014); Rosso et al (2022), and Dashti et al (2022). In general, RC walls with special boundary element details are emphasised to be designed as ductile walls, whereas RC walls with double layers of reinforcement, without boundary element detailing are regarded as limited-ductile walls.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%