Institute of Medicine report on prevention of mental disorders: Summary and commentary.

Muñoz, Ricardo F.; Mrazek, Patricia J.; Haggerty, Robert J.

doi:10.1037/0003-066x.51.11.1116

Cited by 245 publications

(152 citation statements)

References 9 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

122

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Risk for depression onset was significantly lower in the intervention group at 12-month (8% versus 24.7%) and 18-month follow-up and approached statistical significance at 24-month followup. 2 Notably, there was a significant delay in the onset of depression in the intervention participants who ultimately did meet diagnostic criteria, which may be a beneficial outcome itself (Muñoz, Mrazek, & Haggerty, 1996). There are two limitations to these studies.…”

Section: Targeted Interventionsmentioning

confidence: 95%

Prevention of depression in youth: A qualitative review and future suggestions

Sutton

2007

Clinical Psychology Review

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Since 1990, significant efforts have been made towards developing interventions to prevent depression in youth. Meta-analyses of preventive interventions have consistently yielded small but significant effect sizes in the short-term prevention of depression. However, the maintenance of intervention effects over extended follow-ups ranging from 6 months to 3 years has not been consistently demonstrated. In this qualitative review, significant methodological issues that continue to be of concern are discussed. Illustrative studies are described to highlight the accomplishments and limitations of interventions to date. Particular areas in need of attention include the implementation of booster sessions, use of appropriate statistical analyses, examination of multiple outcome variables, augmentation of protective factors, and exploration of mediators and moderators of intervention effects. Future directions for the field of depression prevention are outlined.

show abstract

Section: Targeted Interventionsmentioning

confidence: 95%

Prevention of depression in youth: A qualitative review and future suggestions

Sutton

2007

Clinical Psychology Review

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…As outras 41 intervenções descritas (95,34%) foram em grupo e com duração total variando entre 11 horas a um ano letivo, semanalmente. Na descrição dos procedimentos, 11 intervenções não informaram a quantidade de horas totais, cinco intervenções foram realizadas durante um ano letivo e, para as demais, 19 (Muñoz, Mrazek, & Haggerty, 1996) Participam todos os membros de uma população, independentemente de seus fatores de risco e sintomas iniciais. 2.2.…”

Section: Características Das Intervenções De Prevenção Primária Em Saúdeunclassified

“…2.2. Prevenção Seletiva (Muñoz et al, 1996) Participam indivíduos ou subgrupos selecionados pela sua exposição a fatores de risco previamente identificados. 2.3.…”

Section: Características Das Intervenções De Prevenção Primária Em Saúdeunclassified

See 1 more Smart Citation

Programas Preventivos Brasileiros: Quem Faz e como É Feita a Prevenção em Saúde Mental?

2016

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

ResumoO objetivo do estudo é identificar os centros de pesquisa brasileiros que desenvolvem intervenções preventivas sistematicamente avaliadas e descrever os estudos de avaliação de programas realizados no Brasil. Para tanto, foi realizada uma revisão sistemática da literatura nacional nas bases de dados Scielo e Pepsic que, com as seguintes palavras-chave "prevenção", "atenção primária", "atenção básica" e "promoção de saúde", resultaram em 25 artigos que descrevem 42 intervenções. Os resultados indicaram uma predominância de intervenções longas, com amostras pequenas, realizadas semanalmente, para promoção de competências em crianças e adolescentes em ambientes educacionais. Majoritariamente, os estudos omitem avaliações de seguimento e tampouco discutem as implicações dos resultados para as políticas públicas. Os pesquisadores são, em sua maioria, psicólogos, afiliados a universidades públicas da região sudeste. Conclui-se que a formação de redes de pesquisa e a ampliação de intercâmbio entre a academia e as políticas públicas podem fomentar o avanço da área no país. Palavras-chave: prevenção, saúde mental, políticas públicas, avaliação de programas, intervenção precoce Brazilian Preventive Programs: Who Does Them and How Does Prevention on Mental Health is Developed? AbstractThe goal of this study is to identify the Brazilian research centers where systematic preventive interventions are developed and describe the national program evaluation studies. For that, we conducted a systematic review of the national literature on two databases (Scielo and Pepsic), through the keywords "prevention", "basic care", "primary care" and " health promotion ", which resulted in 25 articles, describing 42 interventions. The results indicated a predominance of extensive interventions, with small samples, performed weekly, for promoting skills in children and adolescents in educational settings. Mostly, studies did not include follow-up assessments, neither discussed the implications of the findings for public policy. The researchers are mostly psychologists, affiliated to public universities in the Southeast region. It is concluded that the improvement of research networks and the expansion of exchanges between researches and public policy can foster the advancement of the area in the country. Keywords: prevention, mental health, public policies, program evaluation, early intervention Programas Preventivos Brasileños: ¿Quién Hace y cómo Es Hecha Prevención en Salud Mental?Resumen El objetivo de este estudio fue identificar los centros de investigación brasileños que desarrollan intervenciones preventivas sistemáticamente evaluadas, y también describir los estudios de evaluación de programas realizados en Brasil. Se realizó una revisión sistemática de literatura nacional en las bases de datos Scielo y Pepsic, usando como palabras clave "prevención", "atención primaria", "atención básica" y "promoción de salud"; los resultados fueron 25 artículos que describen 42 intervenciones y los mismos indicaron un predominio de intervenc...

show abstract

“…The prototype for prevention has been a universal approach in which all members of the general population receive programming regardless of their degree of risk. In recent years, more targeted prevention approaches have been defined-selective and indicated [4]. Indicated prevention, for example, targets Bhigh-risk^indi-viduals who are at the early stage of problem development but have not yet been diagnosed with a substance use disorder.…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

Application of environmental sensitivity theories in personalized prevention for youth substance abuse: a transdisciplinary translational perspective

Thibodeau

August

Cicchetti

et al. 2015

Behav. Med. Pract. Policy Res.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Preventive interventions that target high-risk youth, via one-size-fits-all approaches, have demonstrated modest effects in reducing rates of substance use. Recently, substance use researchers have recommended personalized intervention strategies. Central to these approaches is matching preventatives to characteristics of an individual that have been shown to predict outcomes. One compelling body of literature on person × environment interactions is that of environmental sensitivity theories, including differential susceptibility theory and vantage sensitivity. Recent experimental evidence has demonstrated that environmental sensitivity (ES) factors moderate substance abuse outcomes. We propose that ES factors may augment current personalization strategies such as matching based on risk factors/severity of problem behaviors (risk severity (RS)). Specifically, individuals most sensitive to environmental influence may be those most responsive to intervention in general and thus need only a brief-type or lower-intensity program to show gains, while those least sensitive may require more comprehensive or intensive programming for optimal responsiveness. We provide an example from ongoing research to illustrate how ES factors can be incorporated into prevention trials aimed at high-risk adolescents. Keywords Substance use, Prevention, Environmental sensitivity, R i s k s e v e r i t y, D i ff e r e n t i a l s u s c e p t i b i l i t y, PersonalizationAlcohol and other drug use among adolescents is a serious public health concern in the USA. For example, by late adolescence, over 78 % of teens will have experimented with alcohol, over 47 % will be engaged in regular drinking habits, and over 14 % will have met criteria for lifetime abuse [1]. Despite herculean efforts over the previous five decades to stem the rising tide of substance use, treatment approaches (largely based on behavioral parent training and cognitive behavioral therapy principles) have been modest at best; there is considerable variability in outcomes, and no one model works similarly for all youth [2]. Even among those who experience initial success following treatment, relapse rates are high [3].

show abstract

Institute of Medicine report on prevention of mental disorders: Summary and commentary.

Cited by 245 publications

References 9 publications

Prevention of depression in youth: A qualitative review and future suggestions

Prevention of depression in youth: A qualitative review and future suggestions

Programas Preventivos Brasileiros: Quem Faz e como É Feita a Prevenção em Saúde Mental?

Application of environmental sensitivity theories in personalized prevention for youth substance abuse: a transdisciplinary translational perspective

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About