2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2023.102668
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Institutional analysis of actors involved in the governance of innovative contracts for agri-environmental and climate schemes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 100 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…(4) Multi-stakeholder networks : public (e.g., government), private (e.g., electricity utilities and consumers, smart meter users), civil (e.g., not-for-profit organisations such as China Electricity Council), as well as hybrid actors in the forms of .g., public–private partnerships (such as the Research and Development Partnerships) in developing SG technologies (Sattler et al, 2023).…”
Section: Findings and Discussion: Controlled Dynamism In China’s Smar...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(4) Multi-stakeholder networks : public (e.g., government), private (e.g., electricity utilities and consumers, smart meter users), civil (e.g., not-for-profit organisations such as China Electricity Council), as well as hybrid actors in the forms of .g., public–private partnerships (such as the Research and Development Partnerships) in developing SG technologies (Sattler et al, 2023).…”
Section: Findings and Discussion: Controlled Dynamism In China’s Smar...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In France and Europe, the main tool used to incentivize farmers' participation in collaborative processes for drinking water catchment protection has been the EU AESs. However, their implementation was shown to be constrained by difficulties in adapting the types of measures and levels of compensation to local agricultural and environmental contexts, leading to a lower participation of farmers in the most environmentally ambitious measures (Cullen et al, 2018;Sattler et al, 2023). In other contexts, such as the US, the cost-effectiveness of voluntary conservation programs was also found to be limited due to a lack of targeting of the most vulnerable areas and a low flexibility for farmers in conservation management (Ribaudo, 2015;Stephenson et al, 2022).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An alternative tool to better incentivize farmers' participation is a result-based approach linking payments to the provision of environmental outcomes (Berthet et al, 2021;Stephenson et al, 2022). The main advantage of this approach is the flexibility provided to farmers in the delivery of environmental outcomes (Sattler et al, 2023). A challenge lies in the monitoring of environmental results.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The dataset was generated to allow for an institutional analysis of existing innovative contracts for agri-environmental and climate schemes in Europe, focusing on the involved actors and their roles in contract governance [6] ( Table 1 ). It was compiled in the context of the Horizon 2020 research and innovation action ‘Contracts 2.0’ ( https://www.project-contracts20.eu ) dedicated to investigate four contract types in particular: result-based, collective, land tenure, and value chain contracts.…”
Section: Objectivementioning
confidence: 99%