2021
DOI: 10.1093/inthealth/ihab022
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Institutional and behaviour-change interventions to support COVID-19 public health measures: a review by the Lancet Commission Task Force on public health measures to suppress the pandemic

Abstract: The Lancet COVID-19 Commission Task Force for Public Health Measures to Suppress the Pandemic was launched to identify critical points for consideration by governments on public health interventions to control coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Drawing on our review of published studies of data analytics and modelling, evidence synthesis and contextualisation, and behavioural science evidence and theory on public health interventions from a range of sources, we outline evidence for a range of institutional m… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
51
0
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 55 publications
(54 citation statements)
references
References 68 publications
2
51
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Higher per capita testing may indicate that a government’s preventive measures are more successful for managing the pandemic response [ 13 ]. This testing might also be related to previous experiences with pandemics, notably SARS and MERS, in some Asian countries, such as China and Korea [ 22 , 26 , 31 ]. These countries were more knowledgeable of virus transmission modes and were better prepared with the use of measures such as community testing, contact tracing, isolation, and quarantining of cases [ 31 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Higher per capita testing may indicate that a government’s preventive measures are more successful for managing the pandemic response [ 13 ]. This testing might also be related to previous experiences with pandemics, notably SARS and MERS, in some Asian countries, such as China and Korea [ 22 , 26 , 31 ]. These countries were more knowledgeable of virus transmission modes and were better prepared with the use of measures such as community testing, contact tracing, isolation, and quarantining of cases [ 31 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Third, there may be several variables confounding the interpretation of the number of con-firmed cases in both developed countries and developing countries. There are some con-cerns about the lack of healthcare resources needed to collect reliable data in a timely manner in low-income and developing countries [ 25 , 30 , 31 , 42 ]. In sub-Saharan Africa, most low-income countries have a low GHS Index and a low HDI.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Standard errors are presented in parentheses. 1 All statistics presented are weighted to adjust for the representativeness of individuals by gender, age range, and rural/urban location using national representative surveys; and weights are applied using inverse probability weighting. 2 An income shock is defined as lived in a household where at least one member experienced either 1) job loss, 2) nonfarm business closure, or 3) disruption of farming, livestock, fishing activities in the past 12 months.…”
Section: Respondent's Education Categories Bangladeshmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…High levels of compliance with public health measures are critical for a successful response to COVID-19. 1 Since the start of the pandemic, most countries have implemented measures to mitigate the spread and impact of the virus, many of which require substantial behavior change -an important public health challenge. Adding to this challenge, the prolonged nature of the pandemic will require that countries maintain high levels of compliance with these measures over extended periods, especially in low-and middle-income countries (LMICs) where limited access to vaccines will extend the effects of the pandemic in these settings.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2 Governments across the world enacted a range of measures aimed at controlling the spread of the virus, 3 and increasing healthcare capacity. 4,5 Despite these measures healthcare systems have been overwhelmed and diversion of healthcare resources to address increased demand specific to COVID-19 has been required. 6,7 The impact of this diversion of resources on the care of patients with non COVID-19 illnesses has been exacerbated by reduced staff availability due to COVID-19 infection amongst healthcare workers.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%