Institutional Context and Party Power: Member Participation and Leadership Strategy in the Lame-Duck Congressional Era

Abstract

The authors examine how institutional context affects political decision making in Congress by investigating party leaders' agenda construction strategies and members' roll-call participation across regular and lame-duck sessions in the pre-Twentieth Amendment House . The authors find evidence to suggest that party leaders pursued relatively more partisan agendas in lame-duck sessions and did so successfully. Next, we investigate the effects such agendas had on roll-call participation. The authors find that returning (reelected) members significantly decreased their abstention levels, while departing (defeated and retiring) members significantly increased their abstention levels. Yet the authors also find that departing members could be drawn to participate on certain types of roll-call votes even in the face of strong incentives to shirk. Party leaders rely on the generally higher levels of participation by returning members as well as the selective participation of departing members to overcome "participatory agency loss" and pass surprisingly partisan lame-duck agendas.

Institutional Development and Participation on House Roll-Call Votes, 1819–1921

“…First, those members who stood for reelection late in the year faced less pressure to return home early to campaign. Second, the month preceding election designation does not include votes held in postelection, or lame duck sessions which were typically defined by higher levels of abstention, especially among departing members who would serve in the subsequent congress (Jenkins and Nokken 2008, 2011).…”