Institutional Dynamics in Environmental Governance
DOI: 10.1007/1-4020-5079-8_1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Institutional Dynamics in Environmental Governance

Abstract: The book editors would like to thank the authors for investing intellect, creativity and time into this volume, the Springer editor Esther Verdries for a smooth cooperation, Lieke Michiels van Kessenich for formatting the manuscript, Edwin Beschler for language editing and an anonymous referee for the feedback and recommendation to Springer.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
23
0

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
0
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In many environmental-policy fields, the shared perceptions and definitions of an environmental "problem", including the strategies and solutions of how to deal with this problem, can to a large extent become stable (Leroy & Arts, 2006). Relationships between the actors involved, generally accepted views of who the principal actors are, the division of tasks and boundaries with adjacent policy fields, including who holds the power and resources, can also stabilise.…”
Section: An Institutional Analysis: Crossing Policy Thresholds 771 mentioning
confidence: 96%
“…In many environmental-policy fields, the shared perceptions and definitions of an environmental "problem", including the strategies and solutions of how to deal with this problem, can to a large extent become stable (Leroy & Arts, 2006). Relationships between the actors involved, generally accepted views of who the principal actors are, the division of tasks and boundaries with adjacent policy fields, including who holds the power and resources, can also stabilise.…”
Section: An Institutional Analysis: Crossing Policy Thresholds 771 mentioning
confidence: 96%
“…The changes and institutionalization processes of GIs in that system are mapped using the policy arrangements approach (PAA) and the concept of institutional fit. The PAA is an institutional approach to map specific policy systems such as the energy policy system, through analyzing four interrelated dimensions of the system: the (coalitions of) actors, the formal and informal rules, the distribution of resources such as funds and knowledge, and the discourses, relating to the multiple ideas and frames in the system and their relative dominance [14,26]. Each of these dimensions can be both a source or a hindrance for change processes, and, likewise, each of these dimensions can provide opportunities or hindrances for the institutionalization of GIs, i.e., the process in which they become embedded in each dimension of the system.…”
Section: An Institutional Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Across a wide range of policies, it is acknowledged that the government is not the only actor steering environmental risk management (Leroy and Arts 2006). Instead, complex relationships have emerged between the state, market, and civil society.…”
Section: New Approaches To Flood Risk Managementmentioning
confidence: 99%