Institutional Entrepreneurship in the Sponsorship of Common Technological Standards: The Case of Sun Microsystems and Java.

Abstract

The institutional entrepreneurship implicit in a firm's sponsorship of its technology as a common standard is heset hy several challenges. These challenges arise from a standard's property to enahle and constrain even as potential competitors agree to cooperate on its creation. Our exploration of Sun Microsystems's sponsorship of its Java technology suggests that standards in the making generate seeds of self-destruction. Our study also identifies the social and political skills that a sponsor deploys to address these challenges.

A Theory of Transformative Agency in Linked Social-Ecological Systems

“…When institutional entrepreneurs are successful in creating system-level disturbance, they exercise distinctive system-level capabilities, including the capacity to "see" the system and its dynamics, and to identify emerging windows of opportunity. An institutional entrepreneur may seek to shift dominant social norms and rules (Fligstein andMara-Drita 1996, Zimmerman andZeitz 2002), institutional logics, beliefs, and meanings (Creed et al 2002, Garud et al 2002, Suddaby and Greenwood 2005, and structures of power and Stephenson 2010 Conduct research, spread alternative ideas and knowledge Font andSubirats 2010, Huitema and 2) Vision building Provide a common vision that attracts a diversity of supporters upon which all can agree. Westley and Mintzberg 1989, Folke et al 2003, Olsson et al 2004, Olsson et al 2007 Creating new "social imaginaries" / create community cohesion accross a set of macro level shared aspirations.…”

Fair Trade: Towards an Economics of Virtue

“…Institutional entrepreneurship has been defined as the 'activities of actors who have an interest in particular institutional arrangements and who leverage resources to create new institutions or to transform existing ones' (Maguire et al, 2004, p. 657). Thus, institutional entrepreneurs 'create a whole new system of meaning that ties the functioning of disparate sets of institutions together' (Garud et al, 2002). Institutional entrepreneurship re-introduces agency into institutional/structural analyses (DiMaggio, 1988;DiMaggio and Powell, 1991;Greenwood and Hinings, 1996) via the (perhaps paradoxical) construct of 'embedded agency' (Friedland and Alford, 1991).…”

Towards an Understanding of Social Responsibility Within the Church of England

“…widely accepted, used, and taken for granted) also affects actors' agency-similar to organisational characteristics (e.g. Garud et al 2002;Greenwood and Suddaby 2006).…”