Institutional Factors Associated With Burnout Among Assistant Professors

Duke, Naomi N.; Gross, Amy C.; Moran, Antoinette; Hodsdon, Jill; Demirel, Nadir; Osterholm, Erin; Sunni, Muna; Pitt, Michael B.

doi:10.1080/10401334.2019.1638263

Cited by 38 publications

(33 citation statements)

References 44 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Stressful factors identified were excessive workload, work pressure, low pay, job tasks, low social recognition, lack of resources, as well as family stressors and lack of support (Duke et al, 2019;Rocha et al, 2020;Sabagh, Hall & Saroyan, 2018). In consequence, the level of burnout has a direct effect in work engagement and commitment, ill health and depression (Sabagh et al, 2018).…”

Section: Existing Instrumentsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Importance and Perception of the Character Strengths Scale: psychometric evidence in professors

et al. 2021

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This study aimed at presenting the development and psychometric evidence of the Importance and Perception of Character Strengths Scale (IPCSS)-Professor Version. Two quantitative studies were conducted. In Study 1 the respondents were 214 college professors (mean age = 39.21; SD = 9.77; 55.6 % females), who answered the IPCSS-Professor and sociodemographic questions. Exploratory analysis suggested a one-factor structure for both subscales. Respondents in Study 2 were 262 college professors (mean age = 41.80; SD = 9.81; 50.8 % male). Confirmatory factor analysis suggested the adequacy of the six-factor structure theoretically proposed for both subscales after comparison with the alternative single-factor model. The IPCSS-Professor presented satisfactory reliability indexes and it is applicable for teachers of different sectors in order to understand their character strengths.

show abstract

Section: Existing Instrumentsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Importance and Perception of the Character Strengths Scale: psychometric evidence in professors

et al. 2021

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Esses dados também corroboram os resultados de Levy e colaboradores (2009), que mostram a questão salarial como central, por acarretar a necessidade do aumento da jornada de trabalho. Os baixos rendimentos dos professores vêm colaborar duplamente para o adoecimento docente, provocando uma exigência de excesso de trabalho e produzindo o desrespeito da sociedade por esse profissional, para quem onde o valor do dinheiro é quem dita o status da profissão (CARLOTTO, 2011;DUKE et al, 2020;ESTEVES-FERREIRA et al, 2014).…”

Section: • 509 •unclassified

“…A severidade da SB entre os profissionais de ensino é superior àquela encontrada entre os profissionais de saúde, o que destaca o magistério como uma das profissões de alto risco para o desenvolvimento da SB (CARLOTTO, 2011). Determinados fatores são capazes de gerar estresse crônico entre professores escolares, como a sobrecarga de trabalho, desempenho de tarefas administrativas complementares, salas de aula superlotadas, problemas de disciplina de classe, conflitos com superiores, colegas de trabalho e familiares, reformas educacionais contínuas, déficits na formação, promoção e desenvolvimento profissional, baixos salários, além de problemas institucionais de infraestrutura e organização (DUKE et al, 2020;LUZ et al, 2019).…”

Section: Introductionunclassified

Síndrome De Burnout E Fatores De Estresse Laboral Em Professores De Escolas Públicas Do Município De Capão Do Leão, Rs

Cunha

Vieira

Fernandez

et al. 2020

ICSA

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Trata-se de um estudo transversal que buscou avaliar a síndrome de Burnout e possíveis associações com variáveis demográficas e fatores de estresses percebidos no trabalho. A população do estudo foi composta por 168 professores, entretanto, participaram 102 sujeitos. Como instrumento de coleta de pesquisa, utilizou-se a Escala Maslach Burnout Inventory (MBI) para avaliar o Burnout e um questionário para com questões sociodemográficas e laborais. Os resultados evidenciaram que os professores apresentaram as maiores médias entre as dimensões realização pessoal e cansaço emocional. Nesta amostra, as variáveis sociodemográficas não apresentaram relação com as dimensões de burnout, entretanto, as variáveis laborais associaram-se às dimensões do MBI. Os resultados indicam a importância do entendimento e o reconhecimento dessa doença ocupacional para a inclusão do professor nas medidas de políticas públicas voltadas para a saúde e bem-estar da categoria.

show abstract

“…Although the majority of research in provider burnout is among physicians and nurses, it is a problem across all healthcare fields and professions. Unfortunately, only very limited research has been published among pharmacists and dietitians 25–29 . Ironically, even less research is available for academic researchers and educators 30–31 .…”

Section: Peoplementioning

confidence: 99%

“…Unfortunately, only very limited research has been published among pharmacists and dietitians. [25][26][27][28][29] Ironically, even less research is available for academic researchers and educators. [30][31] For academicians, especially clinician educators, the lack of recognition of and a support system for teaching by university or healthsystem administration leads to a loss of identity and personal dignity, which is a form of depersonalization that has accelerated burnout.…”

Section: Theme 1: People-centered Professional Development In the Futurementioning

confidence: 99%

Forty‐Fourth ASPEN Presidential Address: The 2020 Overture—A New Tune for the Future

Chan

2020

J Parenter Enteral Nutr

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The provision of safe nutrition care to patients is the fundamental vision of the American Society for Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition (ASPEN). Yet we are facing important challenges in our field and society, requiring us to reflect, rethink, and adjust to make new breakthroughs to meet the needs for the future. In developing new plans to address these challenges, we must focus on 2 critical elements: people and the scientific process. Government and organizations cannot carry on their missions without people. But with the challenges of healthcare finance, biotechnology disruption, the desire to facilitate knowledge transfer and now the impact of the global pandemic, we need to develop a forward‐thinking and sustainable approach to connect people and foster continued learning. Burnout is a recognized occupational problem that affects providers and researchers across all disciplines. The coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic has amplified the challenges associated with burnout. Supporting the needs and promoting the well‐being of people, therefore, are critical to move forward successfully. At the same time, the scientific advances in our field rely on sound scientific principles and integrity. Information overload, pressure to produce immediate outcomes (such as cost‐saving initiatives), and misinformation can compromise the scientific process and research evidence. The two common missteps that affect researchers, clinicians, and administrators include premature factulation and binary thinking. We will discuss how these missteps can occur and the approaches to minimize their influence in making sound decisions and policies to meet the future's needs.

show abstract

Institutional Factors Associated With Burnout Among Assistant Professors

Cited by 38 publications

References 44 publications

Importance and Perception of the Character Strengths Scale: psychometric evidence in professors

Importance and Perception of the Character Strengths Scale: psychometric evidence in professors

Síndrome De Burnout E Fatores De Estresse Laboral Em Professores De Escolas Públicas Do Município De Capão Do Leão, Rs

Forty‐Fourth ASPEN Presidential Address: The 2020 Overture—A New Tune for the Future

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About