2017
DOI: 10.1057/s41311-017-0133-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Institutional innovation of EU’s foreign and security policy: Big leap for EU’s strategic actorness or much ADO about nothing?

Abstract: The analysis takes stock of the recent institutional developments within European Union's foreign and security policy and examines to what extent the Union has managed to overcome some of the substantial hinders in the way for its evolvement into a strategic actor. The paper scrutinizes the impact of the recent dynamics within EU's foreign and security policy on Union's strategic actorness within three benchmarks: (1) the capacity to extract resources from various EU's foreign and security stakeholders, (2) th… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Institutional reform and improvement describe a category of determinants essential for transformative processes (i.e., methodical, management and process innovation) within institutions in such a way that different modus operandi and modus vivendi respect human rights, maintain the rule of law, and are accountable to constituents. Primarily the focus of earlier studies (Polopolus 1969 ; Ruttan and Hayami 1984 ; Grabowski 1988 ) and more recent discussions and conceptualisations (Sus 2019 ; Hughes et al 2021 ; Perry 2021 ), interest in this category centres on discourse surrounding the genesis and metamorphosis of institutions. Earlier works stress the role of agents of change (Ebegbulem 1974 ; Pred 1978 ) while more recent expositions give prominence to the implementation of ambitious projects (Williams 2002 ; Chien 2007 ), and transparent public–private partnerships (Zhang and Tan 2019 ; Oppong and Andrews 2020 ; Yu 2020 ).…”
Section: Main Determinants Of Institutional Innovationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Institutional reform and improvement describe a category of determinants essential for transformative processes (i.e., methodical, management and process innovation) within institutions in such a way that different modus operandi and modus vivendi respect human rights, maintain the rule of law, and are accountable to constituents. Primarily the focus of earlier studies (Polopolus 1969 ; Ruttan and Hayami 1984 ; Grabowski 1988 ) and more recent discussions and conceptualisations (Sus 2019 ; Hughes et al 2021 ; Perry 2021 ), interest in this category centres on discourse surrounding the genesis and metamorphosis of institutions. Earlier works stress the role of agents of change (Ebegbulem 1974 ; Pred 1978 ) while more recent expositions give prominence to the implementation of ambitious projects (Williams 2002 ; Chien 2007 ), and transparent public–private partnerships (Zhang and Tan 2019 ; Oppong and Andrews 2020 ; Yu 2020 ).…”
Section: Main Determinants Of Institutional Innovationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Brexit vote in June 2016 contributed to the momentum in EU security and defence policy that has been developing since 2013 51 and which had become especially visible with the preparation of the EUGS. 52 Indeed, it was in 2013 that then Prime Minister David Cameron made the fateful announcement that, if re-elected as the head of a majority Conservative government, he would put the UK's membership of the EU to a nationwide referendum.…”
Section: The Brexit Momentmentioning
confidence: 99%