Institutional isomorphism and social responsibility in professional sports

Abstract

Purpose The purpose of this paper is to explore the corporate social responsibility (CSR) practices of three major professional sport leagues in South Korea to investigate the general beliefs, values, and norms influencing the institutional isomorphism of CSR engagement. Design/methodology/approach Nine semi-structured interviews were conducted with three league chiefs of CSR initiatives and senior managers of related divisions to explore the general beliefs, values, and norms that are institutionalized in their CSR practices. The Gioia method of inquiry and data analysis was employed. Findings Using institutional theory, the current research found evidence of all three institutional pressures of institutional isomorphism that contribute to the institutionalization of CSR practices in professional South Korean sport. The data revealed that CSR has been institutionalized in these leagues through isomorphic pressures – coercive, mimetic, and normative – as antecedents to their CSR practices. Practical implications The current research identified that conforming to the institutional norms may not only act as a force causing the organization to behave in a socially responsible manner, but also to provide the organization with competitive advantages. Originality/value The authors extend the current literature in sport CSR by using institutional theory as a framework to uncover organizational CSR motives. In particular, this is the first study to provide evidence of how three isomorphic pressures work to institutionalize CSR practices in South Korean professional sports leagues.

Mimetic Isomorphism as a Reason for Preparing Sustainability Report

“…culture) defines the rule of the game in society (Baddache & Nicolai, 2013;Schultz & Wehmeier, 2010). Thus, companies that are in the same institutional environment have homogeneous forms of behaviour to get legitimacy (Ilhan-Nas, Koparan, & Okan, 2015;Joo, Larkin, & Walker, 2017;Lauesen, 2014), including making sustainability report. This is what we call as isomorphism.…”

An institutional analysis of gender (in)equalities, COVID-19 and governance of elite women's football in Australia, England and the USA

“…By the end of July 2020, there had been no update on the resumption of the W-League. These differences in NFAs movement through response phases are indicative of the institutional environments and point towards the social and cultural value structures that are present (Joo et al, 2017). This study is the first to outline pandemic response phases of sports organisations and highlights the importance of communication through the first two phases of alteration and decision-making.…”

Sponsorship sales is not only a sport, but an institutional business as well: evidence from two professional football clubs in Latin-America.

“…Isomorphism could be imposed by coercive means, mimetic processes or simply by normative matters (Powell, 2016). In South Korea for example, it was shown that social responsibility was part of the isomorphism clubs experienced (Joo, et al, 2017), and although initially social responsibility was perceived as a cost, in the long run it had a positive impact in the clubs overall image.…”