2021
DOI: 10.3138/cmlr-2020-0013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Institutional Language Policy and ESL Teachers’ L2 Writing Assessment Practices

Abstract: Les pratiques d’évaluation monopolisent une part importante du temps des enseignants d’ALS et ont des répercussions considérables sur l’engagement et l’apprentissage des élèves. Ces pratiques sont aussi, à leur tour, fortement influencées par la conception qu’ont les enseignants de l’écrit en L2 et le contexte politique dans lequel ils travaillent. Bien que plusieurs chercheurs se soient intéressés aux pratiques d’évaluation utilisées en classe par les enseignants d’ALS, peu de recherches ont été consacrées à … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition to their exclusion from extra-institutional research and professional communities, precariously employed teachers are systematically excluded from decision-making processes within their institutions. Contract faculty are rarely consulted when it comes to decisions related to curriculum, assessment, and employment conditions (Arnold et al, 2011;Cook et al, 2021;Dobbie & Robinson, 2008). Their exclusion is easy when they are not invited to meetings where decisions are being made.…”
Section: Exclusion From the Institutionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition to their exclusion from extra-institutional research and professional communities, precariously employed teachers are systematically excluded from decision-making processes within their institutions. Contract faculty are rarely consulted when it comes to decisions related to curriculum, assessment, and employment conditions (Arnold et al, 2011;Cook et al, 2021;Dobbie & Robinson, 2008). Their exclusion is easy when they are not invited to meetings where decisions are being made.…”
Section: Exclusion From the Institutionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The second criterion that should be considered is that the academic writing analysis must consider the amount of time and energy writing teachers already expend on assessing academic writing tasks (Alshakhi, 2018;Jung et al, 2019;Paltridge, 2021). Ultimately, the examination must be relatively brief and efficient without additional time or sacrificing reliability and should retain evaluative quality by accurately measuring the EFL students' writing ability (Cook et al, 2021;Schneider & Connor, 1990). Regardless of the previously mentioned harmful elements associated with assessing academic writing, and the writing teachers often being the only assessor of the writing task, academic essays still tend to be the chosen instruments for evaluating student writing (Cohen, 1994;Haines, 2004).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%