2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2012.02.041
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Institutional ownership and technological relatedness: A test of endogeneity

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Research has, however, focused primarily on financial and innovation performance. A more limited set of studies has considered outcomes such as growth and survival, as well as the impact of technological diversification on strategy (Krammer 2016), structure (Lai et al 2010b) and ownership (Lai et al 2010b;Shin and Shin 2013).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Research has, however, focused primarily on financial and innovation performance. A more limited set of studies has considered outcomes such as growth and survival, as well as the impact of technological diversification on strategy (Krammer 2016), structure (Lai et al 2010b) and ownership (Lai et al 2010b;Shin and Shin 2013).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Research has not found an effect of ownership on technological diversification. But it has had a very narrow focus on US pension funds and other institutional investors (Lee and Kang ; Shin and Shin ). The wider literature on the impact of ownership has established how the motivations, capabilities and risk profiles of different types of owners, such as families and states, shape diversification patterns more generally (Hautz et al .…”
Section: Discussion and Future Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…(Victoravich, Xu, and Gan, 2013). In addition, institutional investors can influence top managers' decisions on critical issues (e.g., corporate restructuring) through their voting power and enhanced information processing capabilities (Shin and Shin, 2013). All these arguments suggest that institutional investors can serve as valuable "strategic-balancing mechanisms" while effectively managing organizations.…”
Section: Managerial Ownershipmentioning
confidence: 99%