2010
DOI: 10.1080/16184742.2010.524241
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Institutional Pluralism and Governance in “Commercialized” Sport Clubs

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
72
0
6

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 87 publications
(81 citation statements)
references
References 69 publications
3
72
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…While it illustrates a degree of association (structural, formal, or informal) between two communicating ecosystems, it highlights the separation between the parent organization and the foundation. Since PTSOs reside in multiple socioeconomic contextspecific spheres, operate across competing institutional logics, and have developed unique idiosyncrasies (Gammelsaeter, 2010;2011;Kolyperas et al, 2015), the CV framework encompasses CCT and allows for a CSR analysis at an "intra-level" to understand how CSR unfolds across one actor, before focusing on the value it creates for multiple ecosystems.…”
Section: Theoretical Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While it illustrates a degree of association (structural, formal, or informal) between two communicating ecosystems, it highlights the separation between the parent organization and the foundation. Since PTSOs reside in multiple socioeconomic contextspecific spheres, operate across competing institutional logics, and have developed unique idiosyncrasies (Gammelsaeter, 2010;2011;Kolyperas et al, 2015), the CV framework encompasses CCT and allows for a CSR analysis at an "intra-level" to understand how CSR unfolds across one actor, before focusing on the value it creates for multiple ecosystems.…”
Section: Theoretical Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Modern football clubs have undoubtedly become places where divergent institutional logics and conflicting social, commercial and political interests can interact (Gammelsaeter, 2010;Jones et al, 2007;Maon et al, 2010). Given that they are currently undergoing modernization in terms of CSR practice and communication (Kolyperas and Sparks, 2011;Anagnostopoulos and Shilbury, 2013) as reflected in the broad range and depth of their social initiatives and in the proliferation of governance frameworks to measure the impact and value of such initiatives (Breitbarth and Harris, 2008;Breitbarth et al, 2011), research that accounts for the dynamic development of the concept whilst focusing on its external and internal drivers and phases is still missing.…”
Section: I In Nt Tr Ro Od Du Uc Ct Ti Io On Nmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Following institutional theory, this combination of organizational and cognitive coherence should push the YOG into being a part in the Olympic, elite sport field (Meyer and Rowan, 1977;Powell, 1983, 1991). Nevertheless, the latter mother's emphasis on the 'youth' part of the YOG exemplifies the ambiguity of the YOG phenomenon, one whose nature is still being negotiated, and the recognition of the youth institutional logic (Gammelsaeter, 2010;Thornton and Ocasio, 2008).…”
Section: Standardization and Isomorphismmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We did not find evidence of coercive pressures associated with the media, likely due to the media's lack of interest in the YOG. Thus, there were mimetic and normative processes, imitating the Olympic Games, and thereby demonstrating the IOC and YOG promoting the elite sport institutional logic (Gammelsaeter, 2010;Thornton and Ocasio, 2008). However, the fact that very few media attended, or were interested in the event, demonstrates a challenge on the media's part pertaining to the dominant elite sport institutional logic, in favor of the 'less interesting' youth institutional logic.…”
Section: The Mediamentioning
confidence: 99%