2017
DOI: 10.17159/2413-3221/2017/v45n2a395
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Institutional support systems for small-scale farmers at new forest Irrigation Scheme in Mpumalanga, South Africa: constraints and opportunities

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

1
3
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
1
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Poor communication lead to limited involvement of stakeholders and lack of sufficient support on the part of stakeholders. This result is in line with a study by Ncube (2017) [21] on institutional support systems for small-scale farmers at New Forest Irrigation Scheme, which established constraints and opportunities related to the collapse on irrigation scheme farms. It is highly recommended that relationship between farmers and government be restored and strengthened.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Poor communication lead to limited involvement of stakeholders and lack of sufficient support on the part of stakeholders. This result is in line with a study by Ncube (2017) [21] on institutional support systems for small-scale farmers at New Forest Irrigation Scheme, which established constraints and opportunities related to the collapse on irrigation scheme farms. It is highly recommended that relationship between farmers and government be restored and strengthened.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…Business Trust & DPLG (2007) [4] noted that famers who had never picked up essential skills and knowledge on irrigation scheme farming had little chances of being sustainable in this farming sector. Thus, skills and knowledge play a crucial role in influencing farmers' strengths (Ncube, 2017) [21] . Farmers with low farming skills and high transaction costs were more likely at risk of producing lower quality produce and fail to access formal markets.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A number of studies have observed several challenges contributing to reduced maize productivity, such as, combined effects of abiotic and biotic stresses, highly variable environmental conditions, use of inappropriate maize varieties and limited resources (Mbuti, 2000;Bennett, 2002;Fanadzo et al, 2009;Jacobson, 2013;Tandzi et al, 2015). Additionally, extension services for smallholder farmers in South Africa have been fraught with challenges such as lack of meaningful contact with farmers, outdated extension methods, low numbers of staff and low aptitudes of extension staff (Ncube 2017). Information on maize productivity in rural EC has largely relied on informal surveys.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hoeng et al (2002), extension services can be more robust when farmers' perceptions and practices are taken into account. An effective extension system should be able to mobilize the social capital of the communities through grouping of farmers with similar circumstances to enable them to either benefit from synergies, or to make it easier for training and sharing of information (Ncube, 2017). Adesehinwa et al (2004) stated that, understanding socio-economic factors can help in seeking solutions to reduced productivity.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%