Institutional Trust Across Cultures: Its Definitions, Conceptualizations, and Antecedents Across Eastern and Western European Nations

Cole, Lindsey M.; Cohn, Ellen S.

doi:10.1007/978-3-319-22261-5_9

Cited by 16 publications

(8 citation statements)

References 36 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Finally, our results may not generalize to institutions in Eastern nations such as China, Japan, and South Korea, or even Eastern European Nations like Bulgaria, Poland, and Hungary. Indeed, there is considerable evidence that institutional trust operates quite differently in Western and Eastern institutions (e.g., Cole & Cohn, 2016;Inoguchi, Mikami, & Fujii, 2007;Peng, 2014;Tan & Tambyah, 2011). Such research, examined in conjunction with theoretical work aimed at fostering an integrated understanding of Eastern and Western properties of trust (Li, 2008), and of the role of context for trust more generally (CamposCastillo et al, 2016), offers promising directions for trust research.…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

The dimensionality of trust-relevant constructs in four institutional domains: results from confirmatory factor analyses

PytlikZillig¹,

Hamm

Shockley

et al. 2016

Journal of Trust Research

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

The dimensionality of trust-relevant constructs in four institutional domains: results from confirmatory factor analyses

PytlikZillig¹,

Hamm

Shockley

et al. 2016

Journal of Trust Research

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…A koncepcionális különbségeken túl a nyelvi-kulturális különbözőségek is nehezítik az egységes fogalomhasználatot. Míg például az angolban némileg eltérő értelemben használják a trust és confi dence szót (ámbár maguk a szerzők is vitatkoznak a pontos elhatárolásról), magyarul (továbbá az oroszban és a neolatin nyelvekben) mindkettőt bizalomnak fordítjuk (Cole-Cohn 2016).…”

Section: A Bizalom Fogalmi Sokszínűségének Okaiunclassified

A sokszínű bizalom

Kováts

2018

Educatio

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

A tanulmány 1 célja két kérdés megválaszolása. Az egyik kérdés, hogy miért lett az elmúlt évtizedekben a bizalom kutatása aktuális és népszerű téma oly sok tudományterületen, és e sokszínűségből milyen dilemmák fakadnak. Ez alkalmat ad néhány olyan alapfogalom és összefüggés bemutatására, mint az intézményi és személyközi bizalom, vagy a bizalom, a bizalomraméltóság és a bizalom magatartási különbségének megkülönböztetése. A másik kérdés, hogy milyen kapcsolat van a bizalom és a kockázat, illetve a bizalom, a kontroll és az autonómia között. Mayer, Davis és Schoorman (1995) modellje, a megbízó-ügynök és a stewardship-elméletek alapján hogyan alkalmazhatóak ezek a személyközi és a szervezetközi viszonyokra? Kulcsszavak: intézményi bizalom, személyközi bizalom, szervezetközi bizalom, autonómia, kontroll Th e aim of the study is to answer two questions. Th e fi rst question is why in recent decades, the search for trust has become a current and popular topic in so many disciplines, and what dilemmas come from this diversity. Th is provides an opportunity to present some basic concepts and relationships such as the distinction between institutional and interpersonal trust, or the distinction between trust, trustworthiness and the behavioural consequences of trust. Th e other question is the nature of relationship between trust and risk, and trust, control and autonomy. Based on the model by Mayer Davis & Schoorman (1995), the principal-agent and stewardship theories, how this can be applied to interpersonal and inter-organizational relationships?

show abstract

“…Во-вторых, высокое институциональное доверие может быть следствием отсутствия коррупции в соответствующих институтах. Исследования показывают, что столкновение человека с коррупцией, как правило, снижает его доверие к соответствующему институту (Anderson and Tverdova, 2003;Cole and Cohn, 2016). В-третьих, институциональное доверие может быть следствием не только объективной, но и субъективной оценки обществом качества предоставляемых государством услуг (Van de Walle and Bouckaert, 2003;Kaasa and Andriani, 2021).…”

Section: исследования связи институционального доверияunclassified

Institutional Trust as a Factor in Attitudes Toward New Technologies

Nikishina¹,

Pripuzova²

2022

JIS

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The success of the country's innovative development depends not only on the supply side (production of innovative products), but also on the demand side – the readiness of the population to adopt new technologies. In this article we test two hypotheses using data from representative surveys conducted in 2018 and 2020. The first hypothesis is about a positive relationship between institutional trust (trust in federal, regional and municipal authorities), belief in the security of personal data collected by the state and attitudes towards new technologies (in the field of healthcare and unmanned vehicles). The hypothesis is based on the assumption that the state is perceived as a guarantor of the quality of the institutional environment and the infrastructure used, which are important for ensuring the safety of the introduction and use of new technologies. The second hypothesis is about a negative relationship between institutional trust and attitudes towards medical technologies, which act as a substitute for the functions that a person performs as part of his job duties. It is based on the assumption that in the case of low institutional trust, the population makes an increased demand for technologies that can replace the activities of a person working in a state system that they do not trust. The results show that, regardless of the type of technologies considered, higher levels of institutional trust and confidence in the security of personal data collected by the state is positively related with attitudes toward new technologies. The results obtained are important for building institutional and informational measures aimed at increasing the acceptance of new technologies by the population. It can also be important to customize measures for specific socio-demographic groups of the population, taking into account the level of institutional trust in the group.

show abstract

Institutional Trust Across Cultures: Its Definitions, Conceptualizations, and Antecedents Across Eastern and Western European Nations

Cited by 16 publications

References 36 publications

The dimensionality of trust-relevant constructs in four institutional domains: results from confirmatory factor analyses

The dimensionality of trust-relevant constructs in four institutional domains: results from confirmatory factor analyses

A sokszínű bizalom

Institutional Trust as a Factor in Attitudes Toward New Technologies

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About