2017
DOI: 10.6063/motricidade.6397
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Instrumentos De Avaliação Motora E Procedimentos Psicométricos: Uma Revisão Sistemática

Abstract: It was our objective to identify the psychometric elements to an epistemological reflection through a systematic review of cross-cultural validation procedures of TGMD-2 batteries, MABC-2 and KTK. Searches were carried out by two evaluators independently without year and language restrictions in six databases: Web of Science, Science Direct, Lilacs, Scopus, Pubmed and The ScientificElectronic Library OnlineSciELO. The key words used were: "MABC", "TGMD" and "KTK" all of them combined with the word "validity". … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These test batteries should allow us to reliably assess children’s motor development, and they should not only be easy to use but also be able to assess the developmental process of children at different ages ( Valentini et al, 2015 ). Due to the importance of motor assessment for both diagnostic purposes and for determining intervention strategies, measurement instruments have been developed/validated over the years in different countries around the world and used in research to assess motor performance in children and adolescents ( de Medeiros et al, 2016 ). The main purpose of studying children’s motor competence is to determine the level of motor development and the factors that influence motor development, to develop programs to improve motor development, and to determine the relationship of motor development to other domains ( Bisi et al, 2017 ; Nascimento et al, 2019 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These test batteries should allow us to reliably assess children’s motor development, and they should not only be easy to use but also be able to assess the developmental process of children at different ages ( Valentini et al, 2015 ). Due to the importance of motor assessment for both diagnostic purposes and for determining intervention strategies, measurement instruments have been developed/validated over the years in different countries around the world and used in research to assess motor performance in children and adolescents ( de Medeiros et al, 2016 ). The main purpose of studying children’s motor competence is to determine the level of motor development and the factors that influence motor development, to develop programs to improve motor development, and to determine the relationship of motor development to other domains ( Bisi et al, 2017 ; Nascimento et al, 2019 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The TGMD‐3 is a valid and reliable process‐orientated assessment tool designed to assess fundamental motor skills of children with and without disabilities, 3 to 10 years old (Ulrich 2019), validated and used worldwide (Veldman et al . 2016; De Medeiros et al ., 2017). The test has commonly been used to assess children with autism spectrum disorder (Ketcheson et al .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The TGMD-3 (Ulrich 2019), validated for Brazilian children (Valentini et al 2017), was used to assess children's motor performance. The TGMD-3 is a valid and reliable process-orientated assessment tool designed to assess fundamental motor skills of children with and without disabilities, 3 to 10 years old (Ulrich 2019), validated and used worldwide (Veldman et al 2016;De Medeiros et al, 2017). The test has commonly been used to assess children with autism spectrum disorder (Ketcheson et al 2016;Mache & Todd 2016), Cerebral Palsy (Capio et al 2011), visual impairment (Houwen et al 2010;Brian et al 2018), attention deficit and hyperactivity disorder (Verret et al 2010), intellectual disability (Simons and Eyitayo, 2016) and Down syndrome (Schott, Holfelder, and Mousouli, 2014;Schott & Holfelder 2015;Alesi et al 2018;Gómez Álvarez et al, 2018;Capio et al 2018;Thein et al 2023).…”
Section: Instrumentsmentioning
confidence: 99%