2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2020.08.019
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Insufficient Mitral Leaflet Remodeling in Relation to Annular Dilation and Risk of Residual Mitral Regurgitation After MitraClip Implantation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
10
1
Order By: Relevance
“…14 The change in MV annulus shape after TMVR was described in earlier studies, and the degree of reduction in AP diameter correlated with the reduction of MR. 13,32 However, the ability of the AP annulus diameter at baseline to predict the degree of residual MR varies between reports. 10,13,31 Although the sphericity index predicted residual MR in the univariable analysis in this study, it was not significant in multivariable analysis. The sphericity index and the annulus diameter are parameters related only to the MV annulus.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 66%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…14 The change in MV annulus shape after TMVR was described in earlier studies, and the degree of reduction in AP diameter correlated with the reduction of MR. 13,32 However, the ability of the AP annulus diameter at baseline to predict the degree of residual MR varies between reports. 10,13,31 Although the sphericity index predicted residual MR in the univariable analysis in this study, it was not significant in multivariable analysis. The sphericity index and the annulus diameter are parameters related only to the MV annulus.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 66%
“…27,30 In addition to parameters reflecting chamber remodeling, MV features have been reported to predict the degree of residual MR. AML + PML length / AP annulus diameter was reported as an independent predictor of residual MR in patients with FMR. 8,30 Although the calculation methods differed between reports, insufficient remodeling of the MV leaflet in relation to the MV annulus diameter is considered one cause of excessive residual MR. Hirasawa et al 31 analyzed 3D TEE data in patients with FMR who underwent TMVR and assessed the factors influencing residual MR. Although the ratio of the total MV leaflet area to the MV annulus area was significantly lower in patients with residual MR ≥ 2+ than in those in whom it was < 2+, the ratio of the sum of the leaflets to the mitral AP annulus diameter was comparable between the two groups in their study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Prior studies with early-generation systems demonstrated a reduction in mitral annular dimensions after TEER in patients with functional MR [ 5 , 12 , 13 ]. Additionally, other investigations have demonstrated a significant association between the reduction in the anteroposterior diameter [ 14 ] and the ratio between the total leaflet area and total annular area [ 15 ] with residual MR. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study to compare, from a comprehensive 3D anatomic standpoint, the differences that take place during TEER between the current and prior-generation systems. The fact that the anteroposterior diameter and annular perimeters and areas were more significantly decreased with the G4 systems might be linked to the greater grasping of leaflets’ tissue due to the longer and wider arms available.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast, secondary MR is defined as MR due to LV and/or LA dysfunction without abnormalities in the MV leaflet and chordae tendineae (11). Although severe secondary MR is associated with adverse prognosis (12)(13)(14), the optimal treatment remains controversial. A recently published COAPT trial showed an incremental benefit of MitraClip implantation in addition to guideline-directed medical therapy in patients with symptomatic severe secondary MR at high surgical risk.…”
Section: Pre-procedural Evaluation Of Mitral Regurgitationmentioning
confidence: 99%