2006
DOI: 10.1172/jci27073
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Insulin's direct effects on the liver dominate the control of hepatic glucose production

Abstract: Insulin inhibits glucose production through both direct and indirect effects on the liver; however, considerable controversy exists regarding the relative importance of these effects. The first aim of this study was to determine which of these processes dominates the acute control of hepatic glucose production (HGP). Somatostatin and portal vein infusions of insulin and glucagon were used to clamp the pancreatic hormones at basal levels in the nondiabetic dog. After a basal sampling period, insulin infusion wa… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

12
126
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 164 publications
(138 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
12
126
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Factors contributing to this time course probably included the time required for central appearance of oral diazoxide (maximal by 4 hours in rats) and the effects of central signals on hepatic p-STAT3 and subsequently on gluconeogenic enzyme transcription and translation (16). This is consistent with the observation that raising carotid and vertebral artery insulin levels for 3 hours did not affect EGP in dogs (17). Moreover, intraportal insulin infusion caused rapid (45%-50% by 30 minutes), followed by marked (80%-90% by 240 minutes), decreases in hepatic PEPCK and G6Pase expression, with significant increases in hepatic p-STAT3 by 240 minutes (18).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 80%
“…Factors contributing to this time course probably included the time required for central appearance of oral diazoxide (maximal by 4 hours in rats) and the effects of central signals on hepatic p-STAT3 and subsequently on gluconeogenic enzyme transcription and translation (16). This is consistent with the observation that raising carotid and vertebral artery insulin levels for 3 hours did not affect EGP in dogs (17). Moreover, intraportal insulin infusion caused rapid (45%-50% by 30 minutes), followed by marked (80%-90% by 240 minutes), decreases in hepatic PEPCK and G6Pase expression, with significant increases in hepatic p-STAT3 by 240 minutes (18).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 80%
“…Short duration pancreatic clamp studies in conscious dogs failed to show an acute impact on EGP when insulin delivery to the head was increased 4-fold (39). Further work in dogs confirmed the ability of ICV insulin infusion to increase hepatic STAT3 phosphorylation and suppress hepatic gluconeogenic enzyme expression (40).…”
Section: Evidence For Cns Nutrient and Hormone Sensing In Animalsmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…This could be due to insulin-rich portal bypassing the sinusoids via the TIPS, so that sinusoidal perfusion in that situation was mostly dependent on arterial and relatively insulindepleted blood supply (39)(40)(41). Studies in dogs with shifting of insulin release from the portal to a peripheral vein immediately doubles peripheral blood insulin concentration, halves the sinusoidal concentration (42), and doubles the hepatic glucose output. This mechanism would partly explain the observed euglycemia despite the marked peripheral hyperinsulinemia.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%