2015
DOI: 10.12659/msm.892056
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Insulin Use and Risk of Diabetic Macular Edema in Diabetes Mellitus: A Systemic Review and Meta-Analysis of Observational Studies

Abstract: BackgroundDiabetes mellitus is a common and serious disorder. A search of the literature reveals no comprehensive quantitative assessment of the association between insulin use and incidence of diabetic macular edema. Therefore, we performed a meta-analysis of observational studies to evaluate the effect of insulin use on the risk of developing macular edema.Material/MethodsComparative studies published until May 2014 were searched through a comprehensive search of the Medline, Embase, and the Cochrane Library… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Meanwhile, other DR-associated risk factors including diabetic duration, blood pressure, BMI, total cholesterol, triglycerides and renal biomarkers showed no signi cant correlation with early DME development. Our data supported previous ndings that insulin is an independent risk factor for DME and insulin usage increased the risk of DME regardless of blood sugar control [22][23][24]. In this study, a cutoff value of 30000U was provided for higher risk of early DME.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Meanwhile, other DR-associated risk factors including diabetic duration, blood pressure, BMI, total cholesterol, triglycerides and renal biomarkers showed no signi cant correlation with early DME development. Our data supported previous ndings that insulin is an independent risk factor for DME and insulin usage increased the risk of DME regardless of blood sugar control [22][23][24]. In this study, a cutoff value of 30000U was provided for higher risk of early DME.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Other research reported that the 10-year incidence of DME was 14% in individuals with type 2 diabetes, and progression to DME occurred in 29% of individuals with type 1 diabetes over 25 years if left untreated [ 6 , 7 ]. Although DME resolves spontaneously in about 33% to 35% of patients, it tends to be chronic in most patients [ 3 , 8 , 9 ]. DME accounts for the loss of 3 Snellen lines of vision in 24% of eyes within 3 years [ 8 ] and in 12% of all new cases of blindness annually [ 10 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although DME resolves spontaneously in about 33% to 35% of patients, it tends to be chronic in most patients [ 3 , 8 , 9 ]. DME accounts for the loss of 3 Snellen lines of vision in 24% of eyes within 3 years [ 8 ] and in 12% of all new cases of blindness annually [ 10 ]. The high prevalence and potential severity of DME point to the need for prompt and effective treatment [ 11 , 12 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A comparison of the equilibrium dissociation constants of anti-VEGF agents aflibercept, ranibizumab, and bevacizumab to VEGF-A 165 as kinetic binding affinity parameters are 0.49, 46, and 58, respectively [41]. Aflibercept has been shown to bind most strongly to VEGF-A 165 .…”
Section: Afliberceptmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The use of pioglitazone [162][163][164] and insulin [165] preparations has been reported to increase the risk of exacerbation of the macular edema. It has been reported that there was a lack of a significant longitudinal association between thiazolidinediones, including pioglitazone, and the incidence and progression of diabetic eye diseases in a 4-year followup study of 2856 participants in the ACCORD trial [166].…”
Section: Agents For Systemic Treatmentsmentioning
confidence: 99%