1995
DOI: 10.1037/0735-7028.26.1.41
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Intake interviewing with suicidal patients: A systematic approach.

Abstract: Assessment and management of suicidal patients is one of the most challenging and stressful tasks associated with the practice of psychology. This article provides information on how to conduct suicide assessment interviews and initial patient management within the context of an intake interview. A brief review of professional training issues and suicide risk factors precede discussion of suicide assessment interviewing procedures. Strategies for evaluating depression, suicide ideation, suicide plan, self-cont… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
38
0

Year Published

1998
1998
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
2
38
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The DICA-R was administered by either a psychiatrist or trained research assistant, Jocelyne Lessard, within the first 2 weeks of admission and audiotaped for research purposes. Lethality of contemplated method was rated on a 3-point scale from low, moderate, to high based on criteria that included specificity of the plan, how quickly enactment of a plan could produce death, availability of proposed means, and proximity of helping resources (Sommers-Flanagan and Sommers-Flanagan, 1995). In cases where more than one plan or attempt was presented, each event was rated separately and used to tabulate an average lethality of contemplated method score.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The DICA-R was administered by either a psychiatrist or trained research assistant, Jocelyne Lessard, within the first 2 weeks of admission and audiotaped for research purposes. Lethality of contemplated method was rated on a 3-point scale from low, moderate, to high based on criteria that included specificity of the plan, how quickly enactment of a plan could produce death, availability of proposed means, and proximity of helping resources (Sommers-Flanagan and Sommers-Flanagan, 1995). In cases where more than one plan or attempt was presented, each event was rated separately and used to tabulate an average lethality of contemplated method score.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As noted by ourselves and other authors (e.g., Fong, 1993;cus to assessment of high risk behavior (i.e., suicide, violence potential; Sommers-Flanagan & Sommers-Flanagan, 1995c;Tolan & Cohler, 1992).…”
Section: Interview Methodsmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…The lethality and proximity of previous attempts, presence of current plan, and accessibility of means to hurt self also are important (Sommers-Flanagan & Sommers-Flanagan, 1995).…”
Section: Clinical Factorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Intent can be assessed directly (e.g., asking the inmate to rate current intent on a 10-point scale) or indirectly by asking about suicide plans. Suicide plans should be assessed in terms of: (a) specificity (i.e., more detailed plans are associated with a higher risk); (b) lethality (i.e., potentially more lethal plans are associated with a higher risk); (c) availability (i.e., how quickly could the individual carry out his/her plan); and (d) proximity (i.e., availability of helping resources) (Sommers-Flanagan & Sommers-Flanagan, 1995). Within the pretrial setting, proximity (i.e., means to hurt oneself ) can be controlled (e.g., place the inmate under special observation); however, specificity, lethality, and availability of method should be assessed.…”
Section: Suicidal Ideationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation