2023
DOI: 10.1038/s41408-023-00794-x
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Integrated analysis of next generation sequencing minimal residual disease (MRD) and PET scan in transplant eligible myeloma patients

Abstract: Minimal residual disease (MRD) assays allow response assessment in patients with multiple myeloma (MM), and negativity is associated with improved survival outcomes. The role of highly sensitive next generation sequencing (NGS) MRD in combination with functional imaging remains to be validated. We performed a retrospective analysis on MM patients who underwent frontline autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT). Patients were evaluated at day 100 post-ASCT with NGS-MRD and positron emission tomography (PET-CT). P… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Sustained MRDneg status at months 6 and 12 have been persistently found to be prognostic for prolonged PFS in other myeloma therapies [ 11 ]. Our serial BM MRD data in CAR-T patients corroborates these findings.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sustained MRDneg status at months 6 and 12 have been persistently found to be prognostic for prolonged PFS in other myeloma therapies [ 11 ]. Our serial BM MRD data in CAR-T patients corroborates these findings.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When undergoing BM assessment 100 days post-autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplant (ASCT), patients with NGS-MRD-negative status at 10 −6 had longer TTNT than those with MRD negativity at 10 −5 and positivity, regardless of therapy, cytogenetic risk, and/or R-ISS stage. Almost all NGS-MRD-negative patients were 18 F-FDG PET-negative [ 58 ]. Although MRD assessment shows significantly higher sensitivity than assessment by the current PET imaging, PET imaging provides a considerable benefit over other techniques for assessing lesion extent and disease activity in patients with MM.…”
Section: Positron Emission Tomography (Pet)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…PET/CT may safeguard against false-negative MRD testing, though with adequate marrow sampling (input) and deeper MRD assessment, the value of PET/CT may be lower. In fact, in recent reports, there has been little discordance between PET and MRD at 10 –5 —10 –6 sensitivity suggesting there may be a more limited role to combined assessment [ 30 ]. While PET-CT generally remains the standard for imaging post-response, whole-body diffusion-weighted MRI (DW-MRI) has strong utility in capturing focal lesions that might have increased relevance in the MRD setting [ 26 ].…”
Section: Readily Available and Actionable Mrd Assaysmentioning
confidence: 99%