2020 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS) 2020
DOI: 10.1109/iros45743.2020.9341677
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Integrated Benchmarking and Design for Reproducible and Accessible Evaluation of Robotic Agents

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Several works have recently proposed benchmarking frameworks for evaluating robot motion planning algorithms from the classical navigation perspective [376][377][378][379][380][381][382][383][384][385], i.e., without considering human awareness constraints. These works mainly focus on performance metrics like navigation success rate, path length, or time required to reach the goal.…”
Section: Simulatorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several works have recently proposed benchmarking frameworks for evaluating robot motion planning algorithms from the classical navigation perspective [376][377][378][379][380][381][382][383][384][385], i.e., without considering human awareness constraints. These works mainly focus on performance metrics like navigation success rate, path length, or time required to reach the goal.…”
Section: Simulatorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Section V) as well as the experimental procedure (study design, questionnaires etc.) available [281]. These issues are addressed by initiatives to foster publications with extended, detailed information on the used hardware and software implementation: So-called 'R-Articles' must be accompanied by mandatory, in-depth system descriptions, code, and further data relevant for reproducing experimental setups [282].…”
Section: ) Reproducibilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Due to a growing set of navigation algorithms available, the importance of quantitative evaluation has increased. Several authors have recently proposed benchmarking frameworks for evaluating robot motion planning algorithms [4], [7], [8], [9], [10], [11], [12], [13], [14], [15], [16], [17], [18].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%