2008
DOI: 10.1117/1.2919101
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Integrated coastal zone management plan for Udupi coast using remote sensing, geographical information system and global position system

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In 2000, 70 aquaculture ponds were recorded with an average size of 0.62 ha in Kundapura, where 89% used fertilizers and 79% used pest control measures in aquaculture farming (FAO, 2007). In 2008, aquaculture activities in an area covering 230.91 hectares near Kundapura region and seven boat building yards were recorded (Anon, 2008; Dwarakish et al., 2008). In 1997, 11,677 MT of fish were caught (Gadgil, 2005) which increased to 32535.26 MT in 2012 (Coastal zone environment management plan, 2012); further 20 ice plants, 2 cold storages, 120 tanks for fisheries, and 55 fish market were recorded in Kundapura in 2012.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In 2000, 70 aquaculture ponds were recorded with an average size of 0.62 ha in Kundapura, where 89% used fertilizers and 79% used pest control measures in aquaculture farming (FAO, 2007). In 2008, aquaculture activities in an area covering 230.91 hectares near Kundapura region and seven boat building yards were recorded (Anon, 2008; Dwarakish et al., 2008). In 1997, 11,677 MT of fish were caught (Gadgil, 2005) which increased to 32535.26 MT in 2012 (Coastal zone environment management plan, 2012); further 20 ice plants, 2 cold storages, 120 tanks for fisheries, and 55 fish market were recorded in Kundapura in 2012.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The composite index of the selected coastal taluka was calculated by their weighted averages by combining the individual parameters (Hahn et al 2009). In the present vulnerability analysis, equal weight was used for every selected variable, an approach that is the commonly used in the literature (Pendleton et al 2005;Boruff et al 2005;Hegde and Reju 2007;Dwarakish et al 2008;Dwarakish et al 2009;Ö zyurt and Ergin 2009;McLaughlin and Cooper 2010;Gaki-Papanastassiou et al 2010;Di Paola et al 2011;Sheik Mujabar and Chandrasekar 2011;Clavano 2012;Karymbalis et al 2012;Addo 2013;Joevivek et al 2013;Gorokhovich et al 2014). Equation 2 is calculated for 14 talukas, and the output coastal vulnerability index values were ranked into four classes as very high, high, medium and low risk depending on their total level of vulnerability of the Krishna-Godavari coastal region.…”
Section: Calculation Of Coastal Vulnerability Index (Cvi)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They included six variables which are coastal slope, mean tidal range, wave height, geomorphology, sea level rise and shoreline change. Joevivek et al (2013) and Sheik Mujabar and Chandrasekar (2011) used the same physical and geologic variables as proposed by Dwarakish et al (2008Dwarakish et al ( , 2009 to identify the vulnerable zone of southern Tamil Nadu coast to erosion and sea level rise, while Nageswara Rao et al (2009) applied five of six variables omitting the rate of sea level rise to construct the vulnerability and their development in the Andhra Pradesh coast, India. For the application and development of coastal vulnerability in India, many researchers have used different kinds of geological and climatic parameters that are given in Table 1.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 2 more Smart Citations