2002
DOI: 10.1377/hlthaff.21.4.128
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Integrated Delivery Networks: A Detour On The Road To Integrated Health Care?

Abstract: This paper reviews the rationales and evidence for horizontal and vertical integration involving hospitals. We find a disjunction between the integration rationales espoused by providers and those cited in the academic literature. We also generally find that integration fails to improve hospitals' economic performance. We offer seven lessons from hospitals' efforts to integrate and then suggest four alternative models for achieving integrated delivery of health care services.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
192
0
2

Year Published

2006
2006
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 214 publications
(199 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
5
192
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Other reported problems are lack of role clarity [9], professional self-interest, competing ideologies, lack of mutual trust, and conflicting views about client interests and roles [10].…”
Section: Cooperation As Ideology and In Realitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other reported problems are lack of role clarity [9], professional self-interest, competing ideologies, lack of mutual trust, and conflicting views about client interests and roles [10].…”
Section: Cooperation As Ideology and In Realitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[48][49][50] So while bundled payments appear to be a future reality, the organizational infrastructure to make it work effectively is largely not in place, and the benefits in terms of producing low-cost quality care are speculative. Therefore, with these caveats in mind, how do these impending changes impact care for the patient with CRC?…”
Section: Health Care Reform and Bundled Paymentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most of these efforts had inadequate resources and weak governance; lacked the clinical discipline and technology capacity to control the use of services or contain expenses; and failed completely. 10 There were a few notable exceptions-such as Geisinger Health System, in Pennsylvania; Intermountain Health Care, in Utah; Aultcare, in Ohio; and the provider system now known as Sanford Health, in South Dakota.…”
Section: Problems With Accountable Care Organizationsmentioning
confidence: 99%