2006
DOI: 10.2328/jnds.28.61
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Integrated Earthquake Fire Risk Evaluation Based on Single Building Fire Probability Applicable to All Map Scales

Abstract: It is difficult to create a fire risk evaluation method that is applicable to different map scales from a single building to the whole region of Japan. Conventional simulation methods use city indices or mesh-data, but in the proposed method the fire destruction probability of each single building can be calculated. Thus the method reflects the actual spatial characteristics of a city and can be used for general purposes with no margin of error. It is possible to rearrange the results in different area units a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The ignition estimation models include regression analysis to estimate the ignition rate based on number of ignitions and earthquake intensity data [16][17][18][19], and a model to estimate the number of ignitions using earthquake and fire-related data (earthquake intensity, building use, and season) [20]. The fire-burned rate estimation models include methods that use dynamic fire simulations [5,8], regression model-based static fire-spread analyses [10][11][12][13][14][15], and clustering techniques. Dynamic fire simulations involve calculating the number of fully burned structures using FEMA's HAZUS-MH earthquake model [5], which itself is based on the Hamada [6][7], and…”
Section: Previous Ffe Risk Assessment Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The ignition estimation models include regression analysis to estimate the ignition rate based on number of ignitions and earthquake intensity data [16][17][18][19], and a model to estimate the number of ignitions using earthquake and fire-related data (earthquake intensity, building use, and season) [20]. The fire-burned rate estimation models include methods that use dynamic fire simulations [5,8], regression model-based static fire-spread analyses [10][11][12][13][14][15], and clustering techniques. Dynamic fire simulations involve calculating the number of fully burned structures using FEMA's HAZUS-MH earthquake model [5], which itself is based on the Hamada [6][7], and…”
Section: Previous Ffe Risk Assessment Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other methods [9][10][11][12][13] exist for calculating the fire-burned rate from wood building coverage ratio associated with the spread of fire. The methodology [14] applying clustering technique involves calculating the regional fire-burned rate using the clustering technique proposed by Kato et al [15]. Clustering means forming groups of buildings by comparing the distance among neighboring buildings with the fire-spread distance determined from the fireresistant structure type of the building.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several approaches have been taken so far, generally by using empirical-or GIS based-fire spread models [2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10]. In these models, rates of fire spread are usually formulated as functions of macroscopic parameters of the relevant city area, such as wind speed, building scale, building-to-building separation, construction types, etc..…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%