2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.jappgeo.2018.02.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Integrated geophysical characterisation of Sunyani municipal solid waste disposal site using magnetic gradiometry, magnetic susceptibility survey and electrical resistivity tomography

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A combination of these two methods can help to reduce uncertainties in interpretation arising when only one method is used. The magnetic technique has been used in several environmental applications to map magnetic materials within waste sites (Appiah et al, 2018;Dumont et al, 2017;Wemegah et al, 2017). Moreover, the ERT method is considered very suitable for solving environmental problems due to the conductive nature of contaminants.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…A combination of these two methods can help to reduce uncertainties in interpretation arising when only one method is used. The magnetic technique has been used in several environmental applications to map magnetic materials within waste sites (Appiah et al, 2018;Dumont et al, 2017;Wemegah et al, 2017). Moreover, the ERT method is considered very suitable for solving environmental problems due to the conductive nature of contaminants.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The magnetic method has proven its effectivity for solving environmental problems and is considered as one of the most rapid, efficient, and powerful methods for detecting the lateral extents of landfills which-in most cases-contain erratically distributed highly-magnetized materials (Appiah et al, 2018). Moreover, the magnetic gradiometry as a nearsurface geophysical method is very effective in determining such relatively small magnetic bodies within the upper few meters of the ground.…”
Section: Magnetic Surveymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Many researchers used the integration of different geophysical methods in dealing with mapping of waste disposal areas and characterization of bedrocks to delineate fractures and faults through which transportation of contaminants takes place in the subsurface and nature of contaminants. Subsurface contamination can occur in different ways like intrusion of saltwater, seepage from buried waste, and groundwater pollution of soil through the landfill or direct contamination [5][6][7][8]. Ground magnetic method is the most widely used technique to identify the major subsurface structural elements such as faults, fractures which facilitate contaminant spreading [9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In particular, waste generated at high temperatures (metallurgical waste, slag from metal smelting, ashes and slags from fossil fuel combustion) have very high magnetic susceptibility, low electrical resistivity, and large fluctuations in the measured magnetic and geoelectric signal, which is a result of their high heterogeneity (Birch, Scholger, Walach, Stremke, & Cech, 2015; Di Maio et al, 2018; Humphris & Carey, 2016; Kowalczyk, Cabalski, & Radzikowski, 2017; Magiera et al, 2019; Vernon, McDonnell, & Schmidt, 1998; Walach, Scholger, & Cech, 2011). In this situation, integrated magnetic and geoelectric techniques may be applied to determine more precisely the location of buried wastes or historical anthropogenic layers (Appiah, Wemegah, Asare, Danuor, & Forson, 2018; Cabała, Żogała, & Dubiel, 2008; Dumont, Robert, Marck, & Nguyen, 2017; Luberti, Vergari, Pica, & Del Monte, 2019; Moscatelli et al, 2014). A combination of different geophysical methods supported by geochemical analyses usually provides very accurate identification of anthropogenic layers (Cao, Appel, Rösler, & Magiera, 2015; Łyskowski et al, 2018; Łyskowski, Pasierb, Wardas‐Lasoń, Antonik, & Mazurkiewicz, 2017).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%