2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.jafrearsci.2019.103633
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Integrated geotechnical and geophysical investigations in a landslide site at Jijel, Algeria

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
19
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
2
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…They demarcated a margin between the clay and silt layers as the sliding surface of the landslide. Contrary to Pasierb et al (2019), we observed an uneven surface boundary between high‐ and low‐resistivity zones, and the estimated thickness of the low‐resistivity layer changes from 15 to 25 m. These observations are to some extent in line with those of Göktürkler et al (2008) from a Turkish landslide, as they observed the changes in thickness from 20 to 30 m. Mezerreg et al (2019) also performed a combined geotechnical and geophysical technique for landslide investigations in Jijel, Algeria, and distinguished four layers. They observed a shallow layer with low resistivity values ranging from 2 to 10 Ωm, that can be ascribed to a saturated lithological unit.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 86%
“…They demarcated a margin between the clay and silt layers as the sliding surface of the landslide. Contrary to Pasierb et al (2019), we observed an uneven surface boundary between high‐ and low‐resistivity zones, and the estimated thickness of the low‐resistivity layer changes from 15 to 25 m. These observations are to some extent in line with those of Göktürkler et al (2008) from a Turkish landslide, as they observed the changes in thickness from 20 to 30 m. Mezerreg et al (2019) also performed a combined geotechnical and geophysical technique for landslide investigations in Jijel, Algeria, and distinguished four layers. They observed a shallow layer with low resistivity values ranging from 2 to 10 Ωm, that can be ascribed to a saturated lithological unit.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 86%
“…Typically, in shallow seismic investigations, particularly landslide studies, the natural frequency used is 4.5 Hz (Capizzi and Martorana, 2014;Glade et al, 2005;Havenith et al, 2002;Havenith et al, 2000;Imani, 2020;Imani and Tian, 2018;Imani et al, 2021b;Jongmans et al, 2009;Karslı et al, 2017;Kim et al, 2011;Uhlemann et al, 2016;Vanlı Senkaya et al, 2019). However, geophones with higher frequencies (10, 14, and 28 Hz) are likely applied in sliding studies (Adamczyk et al, 2013;Bekler et al, 2011;Donohue et al, 2012;Glade et al, 2005;Godio et al, 2006;Grit and Kanli, 2016;Jacob et al, 2018;Mezerreg et al, 2019;Ng et al, 2015;Travelletti et al, 2010;Wang et al, 2016;Zainal Abidin et al, 2012). Since the reliability of the refraction results depends on the accuracy of the picking first break, the first onsets should be recognizable.…”
Section: Data Acquisitionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The number of shot points and their positions are the other parameters considered to provide high-resolution results. The multiple shot-points along with the survey line can produce more accurate data (Donohue et al, 2012;Jacob et al, 2018;Mezerreg et al, 2019;Narwold and Owen, 2002), better-layered velocity models, and interface depth estimation (Rucker, 2000). Samyn et al (2012) designated five profiles of sources perpendicular to the sliding direction and four geophone lines in the sliding direction in rugged topography and complex (flow and slide type) landslide studies using 3D SRT (Fig.…”
Section: Based Onmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations