2007
DOI: 10.1093/biomet/asm040
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Integrated likelihood functions for non-Bayesian inference

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
54
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(54 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
54
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In particular, there are asymptotic connections between adjustments of the profile likelihood and refinements of the estimative predictive density. These connections provide a new rationale for modifications of the profile likelihood, that complements the results in Severini (1998aSeverini ( , 2007 and in Pace and Salvan (2006). Moreover, the result suggests how to construct adjusted profile likelihoods using accurate predictive densities.…”
mentioning
confidence: 61%
“…In particular, there are asymptotic connections between adjustments of the profile likelihood and refinements of the estimative predictive density. These connections provide a new rationale for modifications of the profile likelihood, that complements the results in Severini (1998aSeverini ( , 2007 and in Pace and Salvan (2006). Moreover, the result suggests how to construct adjusted profile likelihoods using accurate predictive densities.…”
mentioning
confidence: 61%
“…For instance, this has lead to the investigation of integrated likelihood functions for non-Bayesian inference (Liseo, 1993, Berger et al, 1999, Severini, 2007, 2010, 2011, to the development of matching priors that ensure approximate frequentist validity of posterior credible regions (see e.g. Datta and Mukerjee, 2004), to the use Bayesian expansions for frequentist computations (see, for instance, Mukerjee and Reid, 2000), and to the use of pseudo-likelihood functions for Bayesian inference (see, among others, Severini, 1999 In particular, the agreement between the frequentist and posterior coverage probabilities of credible regions, arising from matching priors on ψ only derived from L mp (ψ), provides a validation for these priors, and hence their study is of interest from the frequentist viewpoint as well.…”
Section: Background Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This mimics the "integrated likelihood" approach discussed by Severini (2007) and Lehmann (2006). Though the idea of local likelihood for GLMs has been around for some time (Hastie and Tibshirani, 1987;Loader, 1999), to our knowledge, we are not aware of using the integrated likelihood approach to combine the information of local likelihood in the smoothing literature.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%